ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

indoor revision.

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
doorstepped
Posts: 1063
Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 23:17
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere west of London

indoor revision.

Post by doorstepped »

we are starting to go through the motions about getting an indoor revision done in the very near future.

we had the planner in today and he wants to make our workforce 23 FT / 12 PT in an office of 24 walks, 9 will be designated PT walks.

now this is around 64% FT / PT split.

am I right in going to disagreement over this, I thought ( maybe wrongly ) that it has to be a 75 / 25 split or very close to
Rumple
Posts: 428
Joined: 20 Nov 2013, 10:45
Gender: Male

indoor revision.

Post by Rumple »

doorstepped wrote:we are starting to go through the motions about getting an indoor revision done in the very near future.

we had the planner in today and he wants to make our workforce 23 FT / 12 PT in an office of 24 walks, 9 will be designated PT walks.

now this is around 64% FT / PT split.

am I right in going to disagreement over this, I thought ( maybe wrongly ) that it has to be a 75 / 25 split or very close to
I think the 75/25 split was a target over the entire RM workforce, not individual offices.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16631
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

indoor revision.

Post by clashcityrocker »

doorstepped wrote: am I right in going to disagreement over this, I thought ( maybe wrongly ) that it has to be a 75 / 25 split or very close to
That is so BT2010. And it was always an overall percentage split for the nation, not individual offices.
The AFG agreement was for a predominantly full time work force.

Either you have the work to sustain more full time jobs or you don't.
Or you want longer delivery spans.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Ozzvaldo
Posts: 475
Joined: 15 Jul 2012, 20:35
Gender: Female

indoor revision.

Post by Ozzvaldo »

doorstepped wrote:we are starting to go through the motions about getting an indoor revision done in the very near future.

we had the planner in today and he wants to make our workforce 23 FT / 12 PT in an office of 24 walks, 9 will be designated PT walks.

now this is around 64% FT / PT split.

am I right in going to disagreement over this, I thought ( maybe wrongly ) that it has to be a 75 / 25 split or very close to
My office is about 55% FT to 45% PT and has been for several years.
doorstepped
Posts: 1063
Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 23:17
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere west of London

indoor revision.

Post by doorstepped »

thanks for the replies, I will let it take it's course and watch it all fall down around me :)
lcryans1
Posts: 5
Joined: 21 May 2011, 03:33
Gender: Male

indoor revision.

Post by lcryans1 »

My office currently has 16FT and 19PT which is 45% FT and 55% PT. it’s a bit of a joke no one gets made up when the hours are clearly there for it to happen.
rambo1
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3266
Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
Gender: Male

indoor revision.

Post by rambo1 »

doorstepped wrote:we are starting to go through the motions about getting an indoor revision done in the very near future.

we had the planner in today and he wants to make our workforce 23 FT / 12 PT in an office of 24 walks, 9 will be designated PT walks.

now this is around 64% FT / PT split.

am I right in going to disagreement over this, I thought ( maybe wrongly ) that it has to be a 75 / 25 split or very close to
Whatever they do, there won't be enough time to do the new duties, in my experience. It's another pare it down to the minimum job and rely on people wanting overtime because of course,they don't pay the overtime when you're on holiday!