ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Ballot RESULT -signs

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Ballot RESULT -signs

Post by BELIAL »

Only ten days in to the process and suppose your Dom admits "It's looking like a NO vote", and supposing he's not talking about your branch but nationaly,and combine this with the belated cash carrot.

Now it could be chinese whispers but if accurate how massive would the NO vote have to be to trigger such early speculation.

Maybe us wage slaves not as stupid as our "betters" thought
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Post by Carnoustie »

Oh I do hope your DOM is right. :nana

If we secure a No vote it will be a victory for those who can see the long-term damage of reduced pensions vs a short-term carrot of £175 + backpay (on a shite pay deal that isn't even fully backdated to April).

A triumph of wisdom over greed is what I'll be celebrating when the official result is declared :Applause :Applause :Applause
donut
Posts: 351
Joined: 16 Sep 2007, 09:55

Post by donut »

I was going to post a similar thred to this.
My question is does anyone have any solid info on how the vote is going so far ?
i.e is there anyone that knows a friend of a friend of the people that are commisioned
to count the votes or has anyone visited the count site as i heard we were within our rights
to do so ?
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Post by DGP1 »

I hope and pray that it's a no vote but I really fear that the results will be manipulated to give a yes vote :sad: :sad:
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Post by baldrick »

donut wrote:I was going to post a similar thred to this.
My question is does anyone have any solid info on how the vote is going so far ?
i.e is there anyone that knows a friend of a friend of the people that are commisioned
to count the votes or has anyone visited the count site as i heard we were within our rights
to do so ?
Billy knows.
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Post by Carnoustie »

donut wrote:I was going to post a similar thred to this.
My question is does anyone have any solid info on how the vote is going so far ?
i.e is there anyone that knows a friend of a friend of the people that are commisioned
to count the votes or has anyone visited the count site as i heard we were within our rights
to do so ?
I don't know anyone at the count site, not even Dracula :roll: , but to get the result declared at the earliest possible opportunity, would the vote-counters wait until all the votes are in (and the official closing date has passed), before opening any of the envelopes ??? Or is it more likely that given a potential 130,000 ballot papers to count, they would count them as and when they are received ?? If it's on an 'as-received' basis, wouldn't you expect both RM and the CWU to want to get 'inside info' on the likely outcome, ahead of the close of the ballot ??

My guess is that this DOM has heard these chinese whispers and they started from a leak at the company counting the ballot papers.

It certainly might explain why I got that 'Vote YES' card from the CWU today, well after the majority of people who are going to bother to vote have already sent their ballot paper off (sent mine off last week!). Smacks of desperation to me. After all, a NO vote would be a vote of no confidence in our negotiators, and they don't want that :d'oh!
thexxxpostman
Posts: 45
Joined: 03 Nov 2007, 22:49

Post by thexxxpostman »

Carnoustie wrote:
donut wrote:I was going to post a similar thred to this.
My question is does anyone have any solid info on how the vote is going so far ?
i.e is there anyone that knows a friend of a friend of the people that are commisioned
to count the votes or has anyone visited the count site as i heard we were within our rights
to do so ?
I don't know anyone at the count site, not even Dracula :roll: , but to get the result declared at the earliest possible opportunity, would the vote-counters wait until all the votes are in (and the official closing date has passed), before opening any of the envelopes ??? Or is it more likely that given a potential 130,000 ballot papers to count, they would count them as and when they are received ?? If it's on an 'as-received' basis, wouldn't you expect both RM and the CWU to want to get 'inside info' on the likely outcome, ahead of the close of the ballot ??

My guess is that this DOM has heard these chinese whispers and they started from a leak at the company counting the ballot papers.

It certainly might explain why I got that 'Vote YES' card from the CWU today, well after the majority of people who are going to bother to vote have already sent their ballot paper off (sent mine off last week!). Smacks of desperation to me. After all, a NO vote would be a vote of no confidence in our negotiators, and they don't want that :d'oh!
hayes and ward are finished if the no vote wins..all the area branches and were talking a lot will demand heads to roll after giving the thumbs down to this terrible deal..if they stay that immortal sex pistols tune will be renamed anarchy in the cwu :shock:
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Post by baldrick »

During the Way Forward Agreement ballot the polling organisation did count the votes as they came in, and reported the results to the DGS, as their 'customer'. It was in the press at the time if I remember correctly. Some Branches did send in motions condemning this, as it enabled Keggie to get supporting Branches to push their members to get Yes votes in.
I would expect that this is happening with this vote too.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Post by k979aaa »

baldrick wrote:During the Way Forward Agreement ballot the polling organisation did count the votes as they came in, and reported the results to the DGS, as their 'customer'. It was in the press at the time if I remember correctly. Some Branches did send in motions condemning this, as it enabled Keggie to get supporting Branches to push their members to get Yes votes in.
I would expect that this is happening with this vote too.
I WONDER IF YOU KNOW A CAPTAIN ALISTAIR DARLING BY ANY CHANCE THE PEN PUSHER OF GORDON BROWN(LORD MELCHETT) :shock:
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

Not Wishing to offer false hope, but given this deal is clearly an extremely poor one for the membership and has been recognised for what it is, to predict a no vote when barely half way through the process suggests a huge response and an emphatic rejection of the so called agreement . If this scenario proves accurate or even a possibility branches must start organizing their response immediately to pre empt a face saving ,will sapping fudge that will surely be the response of the wounded parties
wakkono
Posts: 392
Joined: 21 May 2007, 17:14
Location: south wales valleys

Post by wakkono »

i think the cash carrot will win the weaker members over and i fear a YES vote
a few of the guys ive spoken to have voted yes simply cause they dont want to go back on the street before xmas
i think we have all been sha fted by the cwu big time
rural driver south wales valleys
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

More info. on a large DO in the soft south today circa. 200 staff word is NO- 100% yes-not one . Nothing marginal there
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72665
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

My feeling is that all the "NO" gut have seen that their votes are needed to get a NO vote so most if not all No voters would have sent their ballots in straight away.

Also the definite "Yes" voters have voted along the same lines as they can also see its important to vote.

Now its quiet likely that at present the "No" returns outnumber the "Yes"but we now have to wait for the Image to get their acts together. Unfortunately most of the fence sitters will see the "bung" part of the deal and vote Yes.

I just wish everyone voted with their conscience and not their wallets.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

Can't disagree with that . We could launch an energetic campaign to drum up mass apathy at this point :Very Happy tricky one :crazy:
Carnoustie
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 793
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 22:00

Post by Carnoustie »

I couldn't care less about your 'apathy' campaign :shock:

Does that mean you've convinced me ? :left: