CWQ latest leaflet thru our letter boxes your questions

[bigsharkboy]

who got the latest piece of CWU/RM propandga thru there letterboxes today

they must be getting worried

i quote the 1st paragraph

"we have received a lot of questions by telephone and email on various aspects of the agreement

it is clear that a lot of misinformation is circulating with regards to the content of the agreement .some of this has been generated by managers who dont like the agreement because of strong union involvement and local negotiations .some is being generated by individuals and groups who have a political or personal agenda

it is your opinion that counts and we want you to vote on the basis of facts "


HQ must be getting worried bout the increasing NO vote

i resent the comment bout individuals and groups and political or personal agendas

MY AGENDA IS SIMPLE VOTE NO AND GO GET A BETTER DEAL not personal or political

:cfo :lfo

dave and billy you should be ashamed of yourselves lowering yourself to alans and adams standard

[Sandyman]

"Birds of a feather" and all that....

[legind]

Who Billy Hayes personal or political agenda?

[mucker]

perhaps dave ward and billy hayes should read letter below from pec member dave warren,the deal is shite simple as that VOTE NO



The postal workers’ strike against Royal Mail has been a crucial fight for all those who believe in public services, run by workers with decent pay, pensions and conditions. With over 130,000 members of the postal workers’ CWU union taking part in eight days of action, the strikers were in the forefront of the battle to break Gordon Brown’s public sector pay freeze.

That action has now been suspended while the union consults its members on a possible deal. Dave Warren, a member of the CWU postal executive, was one of five executive members who voted against the deal. Socialist Worker spoke to him about the implications of the proposed settlement.

‘Pensions, flexibility and pay remain the key issues of the dispute, and I have strong reservations about what the deal has to say in these areas.

On pensions, after 2010, you will only be able to retire on full benefits at age 65.

For manual workers who do a physically demanding job this is a big issue.

Changing our pension scheme from one that is based on your final average salary to one that is based on career average earnings will almost certainly have the effect of reducing benefits for many.

On flexibility the union has conceded the employers’ position almost completely. Local reps are going to be forced into agreeing “efficiency dealsâ€

[Southsider]

[quote="bathboy"]perhaps dave ward and billy hayes should read letter below from pec member dave warren,the deal is shite simple as that VOTE NO


Yip that's about the size of it bathboy. And a big steaming pile at that.

[Tread]

Is that the leaflet where Billy says we're being mislead by others with a Political Agenda?.
Well guess what Billy I can make my own mind up and as for Politics lets see who's kissing Babbys in a few years time.