http://www.comms-dealer.com/industry-ne ... ion-debate" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;?
The CWU's Deputy General Secretary (telecoms) Andy Kerr has stormed into the Openreach-BT separation debate urging Ofcom not to split up the BT Group, backing his argument with a 10-point plan for 'union' that rebuts a joint call for separation by a coalition of comms industry leaders.
The coalition comprises Jeremy Darroch, Group CEO, Sky; Dido Harding, CEO, TalkTalk; Jeroen Hoencamp, CEO, Vodafone UK; Malcolm Corbett, CEO, Independent Networks Cooperative Association; and FCS CEO Chris Pateman.
In May they presented an open letter to Ofcom CEO Sharon White outlining a 10-point plan urging the regulator to recommend the splitting up of BT, claiming that separation was 'crucial to the improved digital connectivity Britain needs'.
But according to Kerr any break up of BT would 'restrict broadband coverage and undermine quality of service improvements'.
"There is no evidence to suggest that Sky, TalkTalk, Vodafone UK, and indeed any other telecoms provider will commit anywhere near the required levels of investment to deliver a world class network right across the country," he stated.
Kerr pointed out that the CWU is prepared to 'push the button' on a national campaign, both politically and industrially, to stop the break-up of BT if Ofcom makes such a recommendation.
"Although Mr Kerr runs a trade union he appears to be well informed about BT's investment strategy and a cats-paw in support of BT's corporate aims," said Pateman.
"We believe it's vital that the people who decide what ‘good' looks like should be Openreach's customers.
"We are throwing down a challenge, underpinned by sound research and experience. A challenge to Ofcom, Openreach and the industry to work together to shape the future for the good of all market players and all customers."
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Kerr storms into Openreach-BT separation debate
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72676
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Kerr storms into Openreach-BT separation debate
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72676
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Comms union criticised for ‘aligning with BT’s status-quo’
Comms union criticised for ‘aligning with BT’s status-quo’
http://www.mobiletoday.co.uk/news/indus ... 80%99.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Federation of Communications Services (FCS) has accused the Communications Workers Union (CWU) of ‘aligning with BT’s status-quo’.
The Industry body was responding to threats made by the CWU to kick start an industrial and political campaign against splitting up BT Openreach. The telecoms union issued a 10-point rebuttal to plans put forward by senior execs from Vodafone, Sky, TalkTalk and the FCS to both financially and legally separate BT from its broadband arm.
The CWU’s deputy general secretary of telecoms, Andy Kerr directly challenged these proposals, claiming that legal separation would severely impact on broadband investment and drain resources. He said separation would give no incentive for networks to invest but would instead force Openreach to renegotiate the contracts of 32,000 employees.
Speaking to Mobile, FCS CEO Chris Pateman branded Kerr’s comments as ‘speculation’. He said: ‘Considering the CWU’s first responsibility is to its members, rather than BT shareholders, it appears to enjoy an amazingly well-informed insight into BT’s investment plans to speak with such authority. Exactly the kind of insight we, customers, would like to enjoy if Openreach’s reporting processes were not so intimately and opaquely conjoined with those of the BT Group.
‘It’s a pity to see the union so philosophically aligned with the BT status-quo. It’s particularly worrying to see a progressive, 21st century trade union arguing that a sustainable future can be built upon forcing a single ‘anchor tenant’ customer to buy your service no matter what. The UK’s industrial relations landscape is littered with the wreckage of industries — from mining and shipbuilding to the tragedy of today’s steel industry — whose managements and unions colluded to try and maintain outmoded business structures well beyond their sell-by dates. We really can’t afford the same thing to happen in comms.’
‘We had hoped the CWU’s response to our 10-point plan would contain an analysis of the likely effect on Openreach workers’ conditions and morale. Instead, we have a series of largely unsubstantiated comments and speculations that sound more like something from BT Corporate Affairs.‘
Mobile has contact the CWU and is awaiting a response.
http://www.mobiletoday.co.uk/news/indus ... 80%99.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Federation of Communications Services (FCS) has accused the Communications Workers Union (CWU) of ‘aligning with BT’s status-quo’.
The Industry body was responding to threats made by the CWU to kick start an industrial and political campaign against splitting up BT Openreach. The telecoms union issued a 10-point rebuttal to plans put forward by senior execs from Vodafone, Sky, TalkTalk and the FCS to both financially and legally separate BT from its broadband arm.
The CWU’s deputy general secretary of telecoms, Andy Kerr directly challenged these proposals, claiming that legal separation would severely impact on broadband investment and drain resources. He said separation would give no incentive for networks to invest but would instead force Openreach to renegotiate the contracts of 32,000 employees.
Speaking to Mobile, FCS CEO Chris Pateman branded Kerr’s comments as ‘speculation’. He said: ‘Considering the CWU’s first responsibility is to its members, rather than BT shareholders, it appears to enjoy an amazingly well-informed insight into BT’s investment plans to speak with such authority. Exactly the kind of insight we, customers, would like to enjoy if Openreach’s reporting processes were not so intimately and opaquely conjoined with those of the BT Group.
‘It’s a pity to see the union so philosophically aligned with the BT status-quo. It’s particularly worrying to see a progressive, 21st century trade union arguing that a sustainable future can be built upon forcing a single ‘anchor tenant’ customer to buy your service no matter what. The UK’s industrial relations landscape is littered with the wreckage of industries — from mining and shipbuilding to the tragedy of today’s steel industry — whose managements and unions colluded to try and maintain outmoded business structures well beyond their sell-by dates. We really can’t afford the same thing to happen in comms.’
‘We had hoped the CWU’s response to our 10-point plan would contain an analysis of the likely effect on Openreach workers’ conditions and morale. Instead, we have a series of largely unsubstantiated comments and speculations that sound more like something from BT Corporate Affairs.‘
Mobile has contact the CWU and is awaiting a response.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.