ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

repick

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
col456xyz
Posts: 85
Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 17:24

repick

Post by col456xyz »

hi
quick question
are repicks based purely on seniority or are allowances taken into account.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72692
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: repick

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

col456xyz wrote:hi
quick question
are repicks based purely on seniority or are allowances taken into account.
Seniority, except for ring fenced duties which have been adapted/designed for an individual because of protected characteristics under the Equality Act (formerly DDA) but these should have been identified during the planning stage and would not be in the repick as such anyway.

However, if people have protected characteristics it does not automatically mean a duty will be ring fenced for them, a duty can be adapted/modified after it has been selected if this approach has been risk assessed. Basically Managers and Reps need to identify duties and people and plan accordingly and be guided by the H&S legislation and advice from OH Assist, for each case.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
roger
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 148
Joined: 17 Feb 2007, 18:51

Re: repick

Post by roger »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
col456xyz wrote:hi
quick question
are repicks based purely on seniority or are allowances taken into account.
Seniority, except for ring fenced duties which have been adapted/designed for an individual because of protected characteristics under the Equality Act (formerly DDA) but these should have been identified during the planning stage and would not be in the repick as such anyway.

However, if people have protected characteristics it does not automatically mean a duty will be ring fenced for them, a duty can be adapted/modified after it has been selected if this approach has been risk assessed. Basically Managers and Reps need to identify duties and people and plan accordingly and be guided by the H&S legislation and advice from OH Assist, for each case.
I thought that pay protection also plays a part.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72692
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: repick

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

roger wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
col456xyz wrote:hi
quick question
are repicks based purely on seniority or are allowances taken into account.
Seniority, except for ring fenced duties which have been adapted/designed for an individual because of protected characteristics under the Equality Act (formerly DDA) but these should have been identified during the planning stage and would not be in the repick as such anyway.

However, if people have protected characteristics it does not automatically mean a duty will be ring fenced for them, a duty can be adapted/modified after it has been selected if this approach has been risk assessed. Basically Managers and Reps need to identify duties and people and plan accordingly and be guided by the H&S legislation and advice from OH Assist, for each case.
I thought that pay protection also plays a part.
Not sure if it plays any part now as very few DOs have night shifts and there are loads of drivers posts in the new DM offices. But technically you are correct.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.