ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Talks scheduled

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
markmutley
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 11
Joined: 22 Mar 2011, 08:52
Gender: Male

Talks scheduled

Post by markmutley »

Do we know if any meetings have been arranged between the union and management, also what do you think we should settle for in any agreement I.e 2.8% in the first years pay award or more and what about terms and conditions 5, 7, 10, years what is acceptable, also a no strike deal is not acceptable in my books but where do you draw the line on compromise any views
north london driver
Posts: 560
Joined: 18 Aug 2010, 21:51
Gender: Male

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by north london driver »

no compromise on a no strike deal is a must.
the pay deal is not the problem as i think we have had a result.
the terms and conditions should be over 5 years with talks to start to extend for another 3 years.
also overtime ban and work to rule to be voted on,also a vote of no confidence on moya greed.
Postie_since_1989
Posts: 18
Joined: 20 Oct 2013, 11:34
Gender: Male

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by Postie_since_1989 »

The general consensus from my colleagues is that a 5 year protection deal on T&C@s would be acceptable, my view is that this is eminently achievable, the 10 years originally demanded is not going to happen, we have to be realistic, but 5 years is the minimum I would accept.
demon
Posts: 732
Joined: 08 Jul 2009, 14:19
Gender: Female

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by demon »

heard a manager the other day saying there close to a 7 year agreement and just needing to tie up the pension deal and work load agreement
dazzlin72
Posts: 321
Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 13:56
Gender: Male

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by dazzlin72 »

I don't see a problem with a no strike clause, if the agreement is water tight, & legally binding by both parties for the duration of the agreement. If broken by RM with executive action etc, then agreement is null & void, & clause terminates.
britwrit
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 966
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 15:12

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by britwrit »

(For what it's worth...) The Financial Times last week said that talks were scheduled for this week.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by DGP1 »

I'd be very surprised if there wasn't talks going on even now, RM couldn't spin a 'no talks at all' policy in anything that looks like they're not just spoiling for a fight.

My personal opinion is there will be a better agreement but I don't know if it'll be before the first strike (and it really depends on how well supported the strike is).
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by fishtank »

dazzlin72 wrote:I don't see a problem with a no strike clause, if the agreement is water tight.
Is any agreement?
What does a statement like "1 in 4 Saturdays for the majority of staff(including reserves)" mean to you and what has it meant to Royal Mail?
There are many ways to break the spirit of an agreement without breaking the words and if we agree some kind of "no strike" deal going on past experience we will pay the price.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Rommagic
Posts: 1511
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 16:52

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by Rommagic »

They should be talking.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by dvbuk55 »

Rommagic wrote:They should be talking.
They're deciding on the menu for the week :cuppa
Dorset Plodder
Posts: 4351
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
Gender: Male

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by Dorset Plodder »

With a YES vote it may help to concentrate some minds sat around the table.

To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war (Winston Churchill)
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by Big Daz »

Courier news flash that comes out on almost daily basis says more talks are scheduled but not when.
silly suffolk
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 728
Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
Gender: Male
Location: deepest suffolk

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by silly suffolk »

Dorset Plodder wrote:With a YES vote it may help to concentrate some minds sat around the table.

To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war (Winston Churchill)
Churchill was a war monger.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by DGP1 »

silly suffolk wrote:
Dorset Plodder wrote:With a YES vote it may help to concentrate some minds sat around the table.

To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war (Winston Churchill)
Churchill was a war monger.
He was a Tory.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
silly suffolk
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 728
Joined: 04 Mar 2011, 21:31
Gender: Male
Location: deepest suffolk

Re: Talks scheduled

Post by silly suffolk »

remember Gallipoli.