ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
thegreatestfreddy
Posts: 171
Joined: 22 Mar 2010, 19:57
Gender: Male

Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by thegreatestfreddy »

Just wondered if anyone was aware of this letter to one of our colleagues??

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... y-2013.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
paranoid-android
Posts: 106
Joined: 24 Feb 2010, 09:17
Gender: Male

Re: Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by paranoid-android »

'deliveries six days a week for letters and five days a week for parcels to every postal address in the UK'

Have you noticed how moya refers to packets as parcels, does this mean that one day a week we can just deliver the stuff that will go through the letter box. That should save some time for rm :crazy:
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

As far as Michael Fallon goes it is :speak to the hand . Always.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.
pcb
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 392
Joined: 21 May 2007, 11:32

Re: Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by pcb »

Problem is Fallon has already stated that Billy Hayes is ideologically driven to keep RM public, yet does not see the contradiction in his own actions. He makes no mention of the fact that a foreign owner could ensure that taxes on profit are paid through another country as per google and the rest of the tax dodgers. :d'oh!
Fallon is bent on ensuring privatisation he has already threatened to go to a assest stripper (hedge fund)due to the present ongoing campaign by the Union. :evil/mad mora has already had discussions with pension funds in North America.
Now who is ideologically driven when Fallon and Mora both state that a profitable national asset must be privatised.
Those in power changed the rules to ensure profitability so they could privatise the service! so again who's idelogically driven? :crazy:
Nearly half a billion quid and they want to sell it, what about keeping it public and using the tax returns on a long term basis? :arrrghhh
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.
John Stuart Mill
bensonhedge
Posts: 448
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 20:14
Gender: Male

Re: Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by bensonhedge »

Mora???? :hmmmm
pcb
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 392
Joined: 21 May 2007, 11:32

Re: Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by pcb »

Ok Moya
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.
John Stuart Mill
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by fishtank »

paranoid-android wrote:'deliveries six days a week for letters and five days a week for parcels to every postal address in the UK'
Allegedly the Royal Mail board's position is that they would prefer parcels to be a 7 day a week operation.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
speckledtangerine
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 58
Joined: 18 Oct 2012, 16:01
Gender: Male

Re: Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by speckledtangerine »

fishtank wrote:
paranoid-android wrote:'deliveries six days a week for letters and five days a week for parcels to every postal address in the UK'
Allegedly the Royal Mail board's position is that they would prefer parcels to be a 7 day a week operation.
speckledtangerine
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 58
Joined: 18 Oct 2012, 16:01
Gender: Male

Re: Letter from Michael Fallon to RM employee

Post by speckledtangerine »

fishtank wrote:
paranoid-android wrote:'deliveries six days a week for letters and five days a week for parcels to every postal address in the UK'
Allegedly the Royal Mail board's position is that they would prefer parcels to be a 7 day a week operation.
We were at the roadshow in Edinburgh today and I put that very question to Jon Millidge after becoming completely pissed off at this 'six day uso' being, by implication, touted as valid for both packets (sorry, parcels) and letters.

I pulled him up nicely as his spiel was not correct and my question was in two parts: Firstly, did he agree with my view that it was negligent to fail to negociate with ofcom in the postal services act 2011 a six day uso for parcels AS WELL AS letters? Further, did he agree that this opened the door post privitisation for potential job cuts with a statute for a five day parcel service only?

Taken aback, he failed to answer the former cohesively and the latter was fobbed off as the seven day operation line.

So, who is to blame for the Uso debacle? It seems convenient it covers letters only. Many thanks to the original poster as confirmation via a written answer from the Minister drove the point home- which was to prove to 400 people in the room that TAKE NOTHING at face value. And he is on the board!