Rival site can't even rig their own poll !!!

Post by **Carnoustie** » 14 Sep 2007, 22:53

Had to laugh at the RM-loving other site. They have a poll "How far are you willing to go", trying to prove there is not the apetite for further strikes. And the top score a few minutes ago was 32% for ALL OUT AS LONG AS IT TAKES

IWW Fellow Worker · Post by **IWW Fellow Worker** » 14 Sep 2007, 23:03

Carnoustie wrote:Had to laugh at the RM-loving other site. They have a poll "How far are you willing to go", trying to prove there is not the apetite for further strikes. And the top score a few minutes ago was 32% for ALL OUT AS LONG AS IT TAKES

What site is that from? They like coloured pens don't they? It has to be a managers site.

Post by **Carnoustie** » 14 Sep 2007, 23:10

its the site several users of this one have been banned from, postmanshat-on-from-a-great-height or something

The other thing I can see from their result is that the pay "offer" is not acceptable to 54% of those that voted. Given that most of the posters on that forum usually see things from a Royal Mail perspective (and those that don't, get booted off and thus couldn't have affected their poll), that to me indicates an increase in support when the rolling strikes get underway again

norbet colon · Post by **norbet colon** » 14 Sep 2007, 23:13

Carnoustie wrote:its the site several users of this one have been banned from, postmanshat-on-from-a-great-height or something

The other thing I can see from their result is that the pay "offer" is not acceptable to 54% of those that voted. Given that most of the posters on that forum usually see things from a Royal Mail perspective (and those that don't, get booted off and thus couldn't have affected their poll), that to me indicates an increase in support when the rolling strikes get underway again

-tell me about it !-patronising ,glib lecture that I got for not being constructive-christ it's like a bad WTL

dididw · Post by **dididw** » 15 Sep 2007, 04:38

Im also banned from the postmanshat for knowing more than the admin + correcting him when he was always wrong.
its run by a non-member.....keep well away.

norbet colon · Post by **norbet colon** » 15 Sep 2007, 09:12

dididw wrote:Im also banned from the postmanshat for knowing more than the admin + correcting him when he was always wrong.
its run by a non-member.....keep well away.

latest topic is tell the union where to shove it " in fear of your jobs , conditions worsening,let down by union hierarchy " -other one is "We're all on the AL/AC train praising thier timing "-so basically it's bend over boys , have the vaseline ready and eat s**t as you'll 1 Get Shafted 2 End up on the dole anyway 3 If you don't , tug your forelocks as you're masters aren't THAT BAD anyway .
Thier rules We are anti-strike -Give up what you've got by giving it all away ! No stirring up of hatred between management & staff , No insulting comments about key RM & CWU Personnel ,Plenty to talk about there eh??!

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 15 Sep 2007, 12:58

I play a little secret squirrel on there (and no I am not the guy called TrueBlueBrit that would be daft) and I am one of those who voted for an All out for as long as it takes. I rarely post on there as I would be banned but as Norbert said in a previous thread its good to see what is happening on their side of things.

coppertop · Post by **coppertop** » 15 Sep 2007, 13:29

I have also been baned from that site I am supposed to have named a collegue but have NEVER I mean NEVER named anyone or used this or the other site for personal attacks as I was told I did . Ithink I new to much and they did not like it

Senior Service · Post by **Senior Service** » 15 Sep 2007, 14:40

I must try harder as i have yet to be banned from that site; even though i may be pushing their polls in the wrong direction for them.

mdtomuk · Post by **mdtomuk** » 17 Sep 2007, 20:22

GOTTA HAVE A TRY TO BE ON THE BANNED LIST - IF I TOLD THEY WRE ABUNCH OF SPINELESS W*NKERS, WOULD THAT HELP?

billypants · Post by **billypants** » 22 Sep 2007, 16:37

I'm not a clever fella and I'm pretty crap at all this internet stuff so could someone do me a little favour , stop being so cryptic and just bloomin well name the site so I can get on there, cause some grief and get banned . . . . . . .thankyou

deadbox · Post by **deadbox** » 22 Sep 2007, 16:49

I was banned for using CAPITOL LETTERS......Honest......beggers belief

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 22 Sep 2007, 16:56

update on their vote:

View Poll Results: will you or won't you be striking in October?
yes 130 71.04%
no 53 28.96%

axeman · Post by **axeman** » 22 Sep 2007, 17:41

come on santa* ****** Helpe* and super **** aren't at all biased toward royal mail ..

found them to be well versed in r.m bulsh** (direct link to ask alan ?)
but don't ever tell them otherwise or it's a ban for you sonny jim !! can't even say you belong to the union as thats a bad thing so they tell me

don't think it's got connections with royal mail do you ???

Carla · Post by **Carla** » 22 Sep 2007, 17:47

coppertop wrote:I have also been baned from that site I am supposed to have named a collegue but have NEVER I mean NEVER named anyone or used this or the other site for personal attacks as I was told I did . Ithink I new to much and they did not like it

I was warned cause i called leighton and crozier the two head dummy

ROYALMAILCHAT

Rival site can't even rig their own poll !!!

Rival site can't even rig their own poll !!!

Re: Rival site can't even rig their own poll !!!

Me too

I WILL TRY!

Banned

Re: Me too