BILLY HAYES MUST GO

Post by **johnston65** » 14 Sep 2007, 21:34

It is now time to be told what exactly is going on with BH we have seen too juch on this web-site concerning his meddling in other peoples branches, we have heard the rumours about him trying to sell out on the pay deal,

I was once a unit rep in a DO when HAYES was a DGS he was full of crap then and I stil think he still is..BILLY HAYES is out for himself. I know a lot about him that I am prepared to reveal unless he comes out and shows his true colours and intentions.. are you listening HAYES?

Wild Rover · Post by **Wild Rover** » 14 Sep 2007, 21:44

Just reveal all and stop pussy footing around the issue.

DGP1 · Post by **DGP1** » 14 Sep 2007, 21:52

Guys! don't you think we should concentrate on :lfo :cfo first then we'll deal with the union leadership later (unless they screw us and then we'll hang then from the Albert clock by their balls).

Post by **johnston65** » 14 Sep 2007, 21:54

Yes but how can we deal with the enemy without before dealing with the enemy within.?

DGP1 · Post by **DGP1** » 14 Sep 2007, 22:05

We need to show a united front whenever dealing with RM, the union leadership has shown itself to be very weak in dealing with management and to cosy with the Labour party but we will deal with them later

irishstaff · Post by **irishstaff** » 14 Sep 2007, 22:06

johnston65 wrote:It is now time to be told what exactly is going on with BH we have seen too juch on this web-site concerning his meddling in other peoples branches, we have heard the rumours about him trying to sell out on the pay deal,

I was once a unit rep in a DO when HAYES was a DGS he was full of crap then and I stil think he still is..BILLY HAYES is out for himself. I know a lot about him that I am prepared to reveal unless he comes out and shows his true colours and intentions.. are you listening HAYES?

Then get intouch with your comrades across the sea and join the crudsade of ridding the union of so-called self acclaimed trade unionists.....and together we can give the rank+file members its union back to where it belongs? Like you we have a lot to tell and where gonna MR HAYES!

IWW Fellow Worker · Post by **IWW Fellow Worker** » 14 Sep 2007, 22:07

johnston65 wrote:Yes but how can we deal with the enemy without before dealing with the enemy within.?

Spot on Fellow Worker! He's nothing more than a sapper and miner under the foundations of trade unionism. So long Billy boy!

Post by **POSTMAN** » 14 Sep 2007, 22:08

I rem a few months back on here,the general feeling and no doubt it still is,is there was a lot of bad feeling about HQ.
BUT like was said then and rightly so now,lets get through this s**t,then hit the other s**t when it's done.
Even a London div rep said at one of our meetings,forget what happened in the past,lets get this sorted 1st.

marky · Post by **marky** » 14 Sep 2007, 22:22

postman its alright saying get things sorted first... but are members are getting shafted over here some getting sacked most getting b&h by royal mail managers. WE HAVE NO BRANCH BILLY SEEN TO THAT. I KNOW WHERE YOUR COMING FROM BUT IF YOUR MEMBERS HAD NO BRANCH TO TURN TO FOR HELP WHAT WOULD YOU DO.

catch · Post by **catch** » 15 Sep 2007, 01:24

POSTMAN wrote:I rem a few months back on here,the general feeling and no doubt it still is,is there was a lot of bad feeling about HQ.
BUT like was said then and rightly so now,lets get through this s**t,then hit the other s**t when it's done.
Even a London div rep said at one of our meetings,forget what happened in the past,lets get this sorted 1st.

Looking at this from outside, it's going to be very hard to deal with :lfo and :cfo if Hayes is going to call the shots with these constant delays and lack of up front information. I've said it before, but letting him f**k things up this time then getting another f****r in for the next time is no good, you should use your own (not just you but the membership of this site collectively) considerable influence to work very quickly to have contingency plans in place for when an inevitably s**t deal is done. Even the threat of this may push things one way or the other. Hayes' (and Dave Ward as well isn't it?) relationship with the Labour Party shows him to be clearly on the other side, the answer to this isn't to get rid of them and get another lot in, but to undermine the basis of their power completely by having people ready and prepared to act on their own initiative.

ulster postie · Post by **ulster postie** » 15 Sep 2007, 12:00

STARTED A POLL GO ON CAST YOUR VOTE ONWARDS AND UPWARDS

Post by **POSTMAN** » 15 Sep 2007, 15:01

ulster postie wrote:STARTED A POLL GO ON CAST YOUR VOTE ONWARDS AND UPWARDS

Bollox,read your post wrong,started one in here an all

ROYALMAILCHAT

BILLY HAYES MUST GO

Do you want Hayes to go?

BILLY HAYES MUST GO

Re: BILLY HAYES MUST GO