ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Stage 2 or not ?

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
royalwud
Posts: 117
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 22:36
Location: Nottingham

Stage 2 or not ?

Post by royalwud »

Ok can anyone work this out,
im on a stage 1 then trigged a stage 2 and it was not issued because
it was an accident at work,
then i had 4 days off sick with stomach bug and that has now trigged a stage 2,
i know a stage 2 is trigged if you have 2 absences or 10 days or more,
well i had 1 absence and 4 days off with stomach bug,
the manager is counting the accident at work as the first absent and the stomach bug as the second,
is this right ? :arrrghhh
Judgee
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 2262
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 15:18

Re: Stage 2 or not ?

Post by Judgee »

If the accident at work was officially agreed as such, then it should not count towards a stage warning. :hmmmm
Union what Union? Do we have a union?
doorstepped
Posts: 1063
Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 23:17
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere west of London

Re: Stage 2 or not ?

Post by doorstepped »

I had the same problem with an AOD not being reported by the manager when I had given him a written request to do so, I ended up getting a stage 3 due to another AOD ( I am not clumsy, honestly ) and when I appealed the stage 3 ( as you can't appeal before that, stupid really ) I got put back down to a stage 1 and the non-reporting DIM got a bollocking from the area manager for not doing his job correctly in the first place.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16681
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Stage 2 or not ?

Post by clashcityrocker »

royalwud wrote: the manager is counting the accident at work as the first absent and the stomach bug as the second,
is this right ? :arrrghhh
The manager isn't counting anything.
The "trigger" comes from HR.
You will have triggered the warning, which isn't the same as having been issued the warning.
The interview should be short and sweet.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.