ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Hmmm.

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
General Mannerheim
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 2299
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:10
Gender: Male
Location: Stalag 17

Hmmm.

Post by General Mannerheim »

This is a piece I have found on the cwu site.
Positive action
The ability of an employer to now treat a disabled worker more favourably than a non-disabled
worker will see many more disabled workers protected in workplace scenarios where previously
the probability of an enforced ill-health retirement or some other ‘managed exit’ would have been
quite high. Our reps must take this development and use it to the advantage of our disabled
members.

So lets get this right the union headbods KNOW about Royal Mail managers getting rid of people on enforced IHR or some other `managed exit` that would be under the shitty attendance procedure then :roll: :roll: .
So the question is WTF are they doing about it?????? :speak to the hand
Royal Mail managers.....about as popular as a t.urd in a swimming pool!
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
Jayfin
Posts: 135
Joined: 07 Feb 2012, 13:13
Gender: Male

Re: Hmmm.

Post by Jayfin »

This is my
Opinion rm and cwu have agreed on a number of job losses in the industry through natural wastage vr stage 3 etc I think the union r not fighting hard enough to keep members who r being dismissed for just being sick , because the top bosses of both have agreed on a number between themselves . Rm don't want to announce x number of jobs and neither r the union . Job losses r going through no fault of the workers who r being dismissed for petty illnesses when there on stage 3 , it's not right Ive had first hand experience of this procedure and it's failed me