ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
motherhubbard
Posts: 1001
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 17:13
Gender: Female
Location: in the cupboard

Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by motherhubbard »

My rep shower me a disagreement about moving to later starts with the introduction of WSM.
It is signed by the Divisional Reps but it says:

CWU Position

The shorter working week impact would be implemented on deployment of the fully integrated end state revision.

I thought the shorter working week was to be introduced in line with the introduction of WSM?
Shorter Working Week
A shorter working week (reduced by one hour per week to 39 hours) for full time staff will be phased in line with walk sequencing revisions. Part-time employees will benefit through an increased hourly rate.


If they introduce WSM but don't introduce the 39hr week, won't that mean we have extra indoor time which will be translated into extra lapsing?

WTF are the Divi Reps thinking about?
Never let the hand you hold, hold you down.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by Martin Walsh »

An intregrated revison is the name given to the walk sequencing revison.

The 39 hour week comes in on the basis of an intregrated walk sequencing revison.
motherhubbard
Posts: 1001
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 17:13
Gender: Female
Location: in the cupboard

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by motherhubbard »

So what is the "end state" bit in the CWU position.

As you have more experience in these things, are you saying the Divi Reps position is correct and we can all sleep a bit easier in our beds?
There has been much chatter about the imminent arrival of WSM, but no discussion whatsoever about SWW.
Never let the hand you hold, hold you down.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by Martin Walsh »

I am saying if you have had your intial £200 payment for a self starter / delivery methods revison then the walk sequencing revison is therefore the end state intregrated revison.

If this is correct that your divisonal reps statment is correct.
motherhubbard
Posts: 1001
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 17:13
Gender: Female
Location: in the cupboard

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by motherhubbard »

We haven't had a self starter/DM revision.
That is why I fear they are not going to bring in the SWW until then.
Never let the hand you hold, hold you down.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by fishtank »

As far as i was aware an integrated revision was a combined walk sequence/delivery methods revision.
Although i didn't think they had the balls to try those anymore....they tend to be messy. :whistle
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
PhilthyPhil
Posts: 1155
Joined: 23 Nov 2007, 19:15

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by PhilthyPhil »

If you are going to start getting sequenced mail but have not yet had the associated revision then you will not get any payment or shorter working week. The chances are they will try and increase lapsing or stop any OT for PT to come in early and prep/sort if you have that. We are in this position in my office, sequencing starts in two weeks but we are not getting the revision until next year. This means the extra walks we have lapsed through the summer are likely to continue to be lapsed :/
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by daveyeff »

PhilthyPhil wrote:If you are going to start getting sequenced mail but have not yet had the associated revision then you will not get any payment or shorter working week. The chances are they will try and increase lapsing or stop any OT for PT to come in early and prep/sort if you have that. We are in this position in my office, sequencing starts in two weeks but we are not getting the revision until next year. This means the extra walks we have lapsed through the summer are likely to continue to be lapsed :/
****** d.o. have got the wsm in, but are still on 3.5hrs deliveries. they have not had their dm, but, they got their 600 quid last friday.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by DGP1 »

You'll not get the SWW or any bonus payment now, we've been told that there's not the money to pay for it so we won't be getting it (not to mention they need to put hours into my office just to make it work).

And what's the union doing......................seems like they're blaming us for it :roll:
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by dvbuk55 »

DGP1 wrote:You'll not get the SWW or any bonus payment now, we've been told that there's not the money to pay for it so we won't be getting it (not to mention they need to put hours into my office just to make it work).

And what's the union doing......................seems like they're blaming us for it :roll:
Well although they put out a flyer on when the monies should be paid it seems to me it is still a nedulous area.

We had the full DM revision last November, all P&L and LCT/HCT and received the £200 in February, the WSMs came in with sequenced mail in March BUT we haven't introduced the indoor revision yet, because according to the manager we can't save any hours - so we haven't had the £600 or the £200 or the 39 hr week. The rep has gone into disagreement but..............................

I believe we should get the remainder of the money and the reduced hour because almost all of the agreement has been fulfilled by us and the stumbling block is of RMs making.
welshy808
Posts: 182
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 20:51
Gender: Male

Re: Heads of in Principle Disagreement

Post by welshy808 »

Dingo,does this mean that the introduction of Walk Sequenced Mail, doesn't automatically bring a WSM revision, with a 39 hour week and 1 in 4 Saturdays. Would I be right in thinking that our start finish times cannot be changed until the revision is agreed and in place.