ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

High Court Injunction

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
jockstrapp
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 970
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 17:58
Gender: Male

High Court Injunction

Post by jockstrapp »

Why are the CWU not going to the high court to seek an injunction Re. agency staff ?????????????????????????? :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
westlondonpostie
Posts: 559
Joined: 15 Jun 2009, 19:19
Gender: Male
Location: Close to the edge

Re: High Court Injunction

Post by westlondonpostie »

Probably cos they're stealing the stuff faster than they can sort it!!
dejavu
Posts: 193
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 16:05
Gender: Male

Re: High Court Injunction

Post by dejavu »

The RM say they employ 15000 casuals for christmas every year they say. Fair enough. But the other 15000 I think is them trying to cover up the fact that were understaffed with all the staff cuts. :no no RM realise that coming Christmas were gonna be in a lot more s**t than they are already in, not through the strikes, just through there bad modernisation plans. :crazy: :crazy: All this round absorbing is a waste of time when your round was already to capacity. RM should admit they were wrong :oops: and start employing real staff.
chewi
Posts: 124
Joined: 27 Sep 2009, 16:19
Gender: Male

Re: High Court Injunction

Post by chewi »

Crazier,Higson etc. won't admit that that they are wrong until the little boy in the crowd(the public) ask why they have no clothes on :shock: :oops: :evil/mad
Night Tonic
Posts: 1474
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 21:35

Re: High Court Injunction

Post by Night Tonic »

Isn't cheap to go to High Court especially if you lose. Union won't do that unless they're absolutely sure they can win.
Don't believe everything you're told in the rest room
barbario
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 411
Joined: 31 Jul 2007, 11:28

Re: High Court Injunction

Post by barbario »

dejavu wrote:The RM say they employ 15000 casuals for christmas every year they say. Fair enough. But the other 15000 I think is them trying to cover up the fact that were understaffed with all the staff cuts. :no no RM realise that coming Christmas were gonna be in a lot more s**t than they are already in, not through the strikes, just through there bad modernisation plans. :crazy: :crazy: All this round absorbing is a waste of time when your round was already to capacity. RM should admit they were wrong :oops: and start employing real staff.
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
gerardy
Posts: 315
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 12:14
Gender: Male

Re: High Court Injunction

Post by gerardy »

Surely for Royal Mail to have got these scab mailsort warehouses up and running with all the necessary machinery in place to run them, they must have been preparing for strike action for a long time now. Again this just helps to show that they are to be used mainly for the purpose of undermining the strikes.
How long would it take to set this type of operation up and in such locations?

Royal Mail must think that we are all stupid.
antcpfc
Posts: 629
Joined: 18 Sep 2007, 17:25

Re: High Court Injunction

Post by antcpfc »

Ward said the other day that the evidence needs to be gathered.The casuals need to be proved to be doing our job when we are on strike and not just assisting. :roll:
Slider tool. Lol.
opgpat
Posts: 878
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 21:56

Re: High Court Injunction

Post by opgpat »

They are if the can get the evidence, keep up.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8327158.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;