ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by Martin Walsh »

The extension of the ballot is only 7 days. Legally to keep our ballot live we have take action before the 20th November in line with the employment laws we have to serve notice 7 days before and that is why we have to serve notice by the 13th November. Royal Mail could have given a longer extension they refused.to so unless their is agreement in place we will serve notice on the 13th.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by daveyeff »

dingo wrote:The extension of the ballot is only 7 days. Legally to keep our ballot live we have take action before the 20th November in line with the employment laws we have to serve notice 7 days before and that is why we have to serve notice by the 13th November. Royal Mail could have given a longer extension they refused.to so unless their is agreement in place we will serve notice on the 13th.
which means we have 14 days to reach agreement. not 7.
Garzongos
Posts: 5
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 11:40
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by Garzongos »

Reading through the majority of the comments on this thread it seems a lot of people here think that RM are shitting it because of Xmas. While it is a massive event parcel delivery is an all year round thing now and what worries them is lots of small customers like eBay users find one of the many ways of sending rather than using ourselves. I myself trade on eBay and a lot of couriers are cheaper than us and the bosses know this so they wont want a strike ANY time of the year.

Anyway irrespective of that, one question I am wondering is are we still getting back dated pay from April which we are due?
Lincox
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3485
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by Lincox »

From the end of today surely we have 19 days to reach agreement before striking on 20th November. We do not have to reach agreement by 13th November, but we do have to notify Royal Mail of intended strike action for the 20th Nov on 13th Nov. Agreement can still be reached between 13th Nov and 19th Nov in order that strike action is avoided. The only problem I see, and that is really concerning is that the membership have to vote on any deal. How long will this take and will strike action be put off again whilst there is a ballot. As others have said this could delay strike action to a point where the Christmas Pressure is nearly over. Dingo, I imagine CWU have considered this and perhaps you could enlighten us on how delays to strike action are going to be avoided or else we are going to lose the momentum yet again.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by dvbuk55 »

Lets stop kidding ourselves here. They've bottled it. There has been 18 days to the 4th Nov to reach agreement with an improved offer and it hasn't been forthcoming and now 2 more weeks for an improved offer to be discussed so wtf has been discussed for the last 18 days? There are shades of 2009 here and we are about to get the sharp end of the stick AGAIN. Any offer has to be presented to the membership for agreement so this time we want to see a simple straightforward proposal without any hidden caveats and revisits liable to alter anything. I notice RM have agreed not to implement anything with executive action :shock: oh yes I believe that.

RM run rings round the union time after time :thumbdown
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by dvbuk55 »

Lincox wrote:From the end of today surely we have 19 days to reach agreement before striking on 20th November. We do not have to reach agreement by 13th November, but we do have to notify Royal Mail of intended strike action for the 20th Nov on 13th Nov. Agreement can still be reached between 13th Nov and 19th Nov in order that strike action is avoided. The only problem I see, and that is really concerning is that the membership have to vote on any deal. How long will this take and will strike action be put off again whilst there is a ballot. As others have said this could delay strike action to a point where the Christmas Pressure is nearly over. Dingo, I imagine CWU have considered this and perhaps you could enlighten us on how delays to strike action are going to be avoided or else we are going to lose the momentum yet again.
There's no reason why we can't strike AND talk maybe that would be a focus for the negotiators on both sides. This is more like the Grand Old Duke of York all over again.
janitor
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 689
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 16:18
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by janitor »

Unless the union are going to pull there ain't no plan B stunt again, the fact the membership has to vote on any deal isn't really relevant, if the union leadership doesn't think the deal is good enough it won't go out to the members, so a vote won't delay things past Xmas pressure, no reasonable offer no vote, and strike on 20th November.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Garzongos wrote:Anyway irrespective of that, one question I am wondering is are we still getting back dated pay from April which we are due?
I will answer this in the style of the quiz program QI Image
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
britwrit
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 966
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 15:12

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by britwrit »

Garzongos wrote:Reading through the majority of the comments on this thread it seems a lot of people here think that RM are shitting it because of Xmas. While it is a massive event parcel delivery is an all year round thing now and what worries them is lots of small customers like eBay users find one of the many ways of sending rather than using ourselves. I myself trade on eBay and a lot of couriers are cheaper than us and the bosses know this so they wont want a strike ANY time of the year.

Anyway irrespective of that, one question I am wondering is are we still getting back dated pay from April which we are due?

I think management is quickly learning that the wonderful world of the private sector isn't as wonderful as they thought it would be. When your short-term cash flow is so easily screwed around with, the competition so ready to eat your cake, your ability to tackle those long-term labor costs is really restricted.

UPS in the US is still unionized, thanks to the Teamsters. That's the model the CWU should be aiming for.
S6 Stroller
Posts: 199
Joined: 07 Sep 2009, 23:00
Gender: Male

Re: Strike posponed

Post by S6 Stroller »

flaminmoses wrote:rm must be serious about sorting this out then as if they aren't the strikes will fall in the Christmas rush.

cwu played a blinder on timing imo

tbf rm had nowhere to go after the share price rocketed
Completely agree. I think it's RM who are shitting it not CWU.
RTP
Posts: 863
Joined: 22 Apr 2011, 14:24
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by RTP »

dvbuk55 wrote:Lets stop kidding ourselves here. They've bottled it. There has been 18 days to the 4th Nov to reach agreement with an improved offer and it hasn't been forthcoming and now 2 more weeks for an improved offer to be discussed so wtf has been discussed for the last 18 days? There are shades of 2009 here and we are about to get the sharp end of the stick AGAIN. Any offer has to be presented to the membership for agreement so this time we want to see a simple straightforward proposal without any hidden caveats and revisits liable to alter anything. I notice RM have agreed not to implement anything with executive action :shock: oh yes I believe that.

RM run rings round the union time after time :thumbdown
Put the kettle on, get a biscuit and relax instead of looking at the book cover and imagining what's inside before you've even opened it.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by dvbuk55 »

RTP wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Lets stop kidding ourselves here. They've bottled it. There has been 18 days to the 4th Nov to reach agreement with an improved offer and it hasn't been forthcoming and now 2 more weeks for an improved offer to be discussed so wtf has been discussed for the last 18 days? There are shades of 2009 here and we are about to get the sharp end of the stick AGAIN. Any offer has to be presented to the membership for agreement so this time we want to see a simple straightforward proposal without any hidden caveats and revisits liable to alter anything. I notice RM have agreed not to implement anything with executive action :shock: oh yes I believe that.

RM run rings round the union time after time :thumbdown
Put the kettle on, get a biscuit and relax instead of looking at the book cover and imagining what's inside before you've even opened it.
You read the book RTP, I've seen the movie, got the DVD and the t-shirt, believe me this is JAWS II. If we come out of this better than BT 2010 I'll show my ars* on the town hall steps. Even when we've been shafted you'll still get the diehards saying what a wonderful agreement - just like last time - you know the script, no Plan B and the best we can get.................without any action.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by Big Daz »

dvbuk55 wrote:
RTP wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Lets stop kidding ourselves here. They've bottled it. There has been 18 days to the 4th Nov to reach agreement with an improved offer and it hasn't been forthcoming and now 2 more weeks for an improved offer to be discussed so wtf has been discussed for the last 18 days? There are shades of 2009 here and we are about to get the sharp end of the stick AGAIN. Any offer has to be presented to the membership for agreement so this time we want to see a simple straightforward proposal without any hidden caveats and revisits liable to alter anything. I notice RM have agreed not to implement anything with executive action :shock: oh yes I believe that.

RM run rings round the union time after time :thumbdown
Put the kettle on, get a biscuit and relax instead of looking at the book cover and imagining what's inside before you've even opened it.
You read the book RTP, I've seen the movie, got the DVD and the t-shirt, believe me this is JAWS II. If we come out of this better than BT 2010 I'll show my ars* on the town hall steps. Even when we've been shafted you'll still get the diehards saying what a wonderful agreement - just like last time - you know the script, no Plan B and the best we can get.................without any action.

If that happens I'll buy you a new shed and bring the handmaidens out of retirement. :chuckle
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by cloherty1976 »

dvbuk55 wrote:
RTP wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Lets stop kidding ourselves here. They've bottled it. There has been 18 days to the 4th Nov to reach agreement with an improved offer and it hasn't been forthcoming and now 2 more weeks for an improved offer to be discussed so wtf has been discussed for the last 18 days? There are shades of 2009 here and we are about to get the sharp end of the stick AGAIN. Any offer has to be presented to the membership for agreement so this time we want to see a simple straightforward proposal without any hidden caveats and revisits liable to alter anything. I notice RM have agreed not to implement anything with executive action :shock: oh yes I believe that.

RM run rings round the union time after time :thumbdown
Put the kettle on, get a biscuit and relax instead of looking at the book cover and imagining what's inside before you've even opened it.
You read the book RTP, I've seen the movie, got the DVD and the t-shirt, believe me this is JAWS II. If we come out of this better than BT 2010 I'll show my ars* on the town hall steps. Even when we've been shafted you'll still get the diehards saying what a wonderful agreement - just like last time - you know the script, no Plan B and the best we can get.................without any action.
I like what you say and makes me laugh. I agree what you say but also believe the union were worried how many were working and if they would have paid the £300. I think they would but you will never know for sure so it's a safe bet to withdraw the strike on the 4th I believe myself.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by dvbuk55 »

Big Daz wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
RTP wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:Lets stop kidding ourselves here. They've bottled it. There has been 18 days to the 4th Nov to reach agreement with an improved offer and it hasn't been forthcoming and now 2 more weeks for an improved offer to be discussed so wtf has been discussed for the last 18 days? There are shades of 2009 here and we are about to get the sharp end of the stick AGAIN. Any offer has to be presented to the membership for agreement so this time we want to see a simple straightforward proposal without any hidden caveats and revisits liable to alter anything. I notice RM have agreed not to implement anything with executive action :shock: oh yes I believe that.

RM run rings round the union time after time :thumbdown
Put the kettle on, get a biscuit and relax instead of looking at the book cover and imagining what's inside before you've even opened it.
You read the book RTP, I've seen the movie, got the DVD and the t-shirt, believe me this is JAWS II. If we come out of this better than BT 2010 I'll show my ars* on the town hall steps. Even when we've been shafted you'll still get the diehards saying what a wonderful agreement - just like last time - you know the script, no Plan B and the best we can get.................without any action.

If that happens I'll buy you a new shed and bring the handmaidens out of retirement. :chuckle
Wow thanks BD that'll be 4 yep 4 sheds and the handmaidens will definitely come in handy...........pardon the pun.........I've been having a little discomfort with arthritis in my hands and they may be able to help an aged gent out :wink: