ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Royal Mail's take on the new agreement...

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Edward Hunter
Posts: 679
Joined: 23 May 2007, 22:30

Re: Royal Mail's take on the new agreement...

Post by Edward Hunter »

we have 5 years with the same t+cs, which i cant fault. Nationally the only thing that would cause a walkout would be the rduction of those t+cs. RM do that we walk. fact. National dispute, agreement f****d anyway.
freelunch
Posts: 358
Joined: 14 Oct 2012, 20:39
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail's take on the new agreement...

Post by freelunch »

Edward Hunter wrote:we have 5 years with the same t+cs, which i cant fault. Nationally the only thing that would cause a walkout would be the rduction of those t+cs. RM do that we walk. fact. National dispute, agreement f****d anyway.
Did you stop to wonder why the pay agreement is for just 3 years? There's more chance of finding a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow than our t+c's actually lasting 5 years. The "reviews" begin as soon as the yes vote is in the bag. The resulting actions will erode those very terms via short-term incentives agreed with the union. Royal Mail said from the start they can't agree to guarantee to protect jobs for more than 3 years; they meant it.
"Everybody has a plan.. until they get punched in the face" - Mike Tyson
2pints
Posts: 286
Joined: 28 Feb 2013, 16:46
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail's take on the new agreement...

Post by 2pints »

Great deal.I see nothing to complain about.
toomuchcoke
Posts: 309
Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 18:15
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail's take on the new agreement...

Post by toomuchcoke »

fishtank wrote:How hard is it to make one part of the business "financially unsustainable" on paper?
Royal Mail directors announce that $PART of Royal Mail is going under financially, RMG.L share price tanks, hen it's revealed that the management knowingly lied about the problems. You don't think those "evil hedge funds"(TM) are going to not sue the board for failing in their fiduciary duty to the shareholders, causing those shareholders actual financial loss? Furthermore, do you think this might affect the chances of those directors getting reelected to the board and/or (re)elected to the boards of other companies?
ritchie_54
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 27
Joined: 27 Nov 2012, 09:46
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail's take on the new agreement...

Post by ritchie_54 »

It looks like the mail centre closure programme will also accelerate under this deal, whether you are in delivery or not this will have a profound affect on you and the way you do the job, having your parent mail centre many many miles away from your delivery offices will mean the work arriving later and later in your office until such time as you will be working days or worst case scenario late turn deliveries, look at Hull, its now a 70 mile journey for your inward work to come from Sheffield, so assuming a 6 o'clock tie up at the mail centre what time will the last of your work arrive? It will be 8 o'clock starts, sorting till around 11 then out on delivery, 4hr delivery and finish around 4, you can see it happening, there are a lot of posts on here that reflect the separation of deliveries from processing (RM did it for a reason folks!) Just remember we're all in this together, whether out on delivery or sorting letters in a factory unit somewhere, this job only worked because of the way we were organised, new ways of working, hub distribution etc has destroyed that organisation and made the job even harder imho