ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Andy51
Posts: 91
Joined: 08 Jan 2013, 15:45
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by Andy51 »

Agree
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by fishtank »

cloherty1976 wrote:I did say this weeks ago and got slaughtered for it
What?
That there would be a deal?
There has been for every single dispute I've ever been involved in so well done for sticking your neck out and calling this one right.

You also said we should have accepted the old deal which means 1-8 wouldn't exist including longer protections,more money and a separate pension agreement.

You folded too early cloherty,there's no class in trying to ride on the back of someone else's achievements.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
cloherty1976
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1236
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 12:16
Gender: Male
Location: The south

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by cloherty1976 »

fishtank wrote:
cloherty1976 wrote:I did say this weeks ago and got slaughtered for it
What?
That there would be a deal?
There has been for every single dispute I've ever been involved in so well done for sticking your neck out and calling this one right.

You also said we should have accepted the old deal which means 1-8 wouldn't exist including longer protections,more money and a separate pension agreement.

You folded too early cloherty,there's no class in trying to ride on the back of someone else's achievements.
I was happy with the old deal yes I agree. Remember this though if you are happy with this deal just don't moan about in a few years time.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by Martin Walsh »

The union have made it clear that there will no be a no strike deal and that we won't be agreeing to binding arbitration either. Royal Mail have offered a commitment to never taking executive action , the CWU welcomes that and willing to look at mediation or arbitration to resolve issues but will under no circumstances give up our legal right to strike.

Royal Mail have agreed to improve the pay offer and extend the legal protections from 3 years to 5 with no end date but a review and notice periods

The threat of strike action has moved the employer and in the next 7 days there will be either an agreement or the union has to serve legal notice by the 13th of November for strike action.
meweavy
Posts: 473
Joined: 10 May 2007, 11:07

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by meweavy »

Surely this new deal would go to a ballot to us.
If there is a no strike deal then surely rm staff will vote no to the deal?.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4276
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by Martin Walsh »

All the details have to be written up the issues of a fair days work still needs to be negotiated. If there is a deal within 7 days it will go to ballot of the membership if there is no deal then the union will notify for strike action and cannot strike later than 20th November
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by chrisj »

boring...

:shock: Not!
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by dvbuk55 »

meweavy wrote:Surely this new deal would go to a ballot to us.
If there is a no strike deal then surely rm staff will vote no to the deal?.
An agenda for growth underpinned by a culture of consensual change, timely decision making and industrial stability supported by alternative dispute resolution processes.

Couched in these terms it doesn't look like a no strike clause but in fact it is. Once the teeth have been pulled is the CWU going to gum RM into submission.
meweavy
Posts: 473
Joined: 10 May 2007, 11:07

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by meweavy »

dvbuk55 wrote:
meweavy wrote:Surely this new deal would go to a ballot to us.
If there is a no strike deal then surely rm staff will vote no to the deal?.
An agenda for growth underpinned by a culture of consensual change, timely decision making and industrial stability supported by alternative dispute resolution processes.

Couched in these terms it doesn't look like a no strike clause but in fact it is. Once the teeth have been pulled is the CWU going to gum RM into submission.
Yeah that does look like a no strike deal in the agenda.
They can do one if that is part of the new deal.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16689
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by clashcityrocker »

dvbuk55 wrote:
An agenda for growth underpinned by a culture of consensual change, timely decision making and industrial stability supported by alternative dispute resolution processes.

Couched in these terms it doesn't look like a no strike clause but in fact it is. Once the teeth have been pulled is the CWU going to gum RM into submission.
But the alternative resolution process might be a fight in the car park.
They send their top boys........
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
bunkerland
Posts: 546
Joined: 11 Oct 2009, 21:40
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by bunkerland »

cloherty1976 wrote:I did say this weeks ago and got slaughtered for it but know it has happened lets just get back to work and enjoy our future at Royal Mail :Very Happy
Well done! I bet Nostradamus would have been shitting himself if you'd been about in the 16th century. :roll: :Very Happy
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by dvbuk55 »

dingo wrote:All the details have to be written up the issues of a fair days work still needs to be negotiated. If there is a deal within 7 days it will go to ballot of the membership if there is no deal then the union will notify for strike action and cannot strike later than 20th November
Well lets hope the i's are dotted and the t's crossed this time and we aren't staggering into yet another half-arsed agreement that still festers 4 years on. No roadshow this time lets have a fair and reasonable ballot to the new deal with an honest appraisal that includes a plan B. I have to be honest and say this 11th hour reprieve does not fill me with overwhelming confidence that this deal is going to waver too far from the original.

Lets see the detail in full this time.
britwrit
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 966
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 15:12

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by britwrit »

cloherty1976 wrote:
fishtank wrote:
cloherty1976 wrote:I did say this weeks ago and got slaughtered for it
What?
That there would be a deal?
There has been for every single dispute I've ever been involved in so well done for sticking your neck out and calling this one right.

You also said we should have accepted the old deal which means 1-8 wouldn't exist including longer protections,more money and a separate pension agreement.

You folded too early cloherty,there's no class in trying to ride on the back of someone else's achievements.
I was happy with the old deal yes I agree. Remember this though if you are happy with this deal just don't moan about in a few years time.

On the record, I was unhappy with the old deal. And I said some things... things that were probably a little too hurtful and mean. The old deal heard about this, and word got back to me that the old deal was hurt. I felt bad about it but then the old deal kept writing and texting me, over and over again. Finally, I had to put my foot down and had to write the old deal a letter (on paper, of course.) Look OD, I said, It's just not going to work out. Let's just move on with our lives.

Now I have this new deal and I'm hopeful and scared and I just don't know what I want to do, except maybe sing show tunes and cry at the same time. So let's get on with it.

(By the way, this has nothing to do with Royal Mail but my divorce has finally come through. Does anyone know anybody nice in the London area?)
wf
Posts: 183
Joined: 01 Nov 2009, 13:21
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by wf »

Any mention of the in going bullying culture
Any mention of the outstanding bt2010 payments
Any mention of the bt2010 agreement being
Being ignored on a daily basis
1 in 4 Saturday's ?
Maybe I'm asking too much
BernardBresslaw
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Nov 2011, 15:52
Gender: Male

Re: National Dispute - Joint Statement 30th October 2013

Post by BernardBresslaw »

dvbuk55 wrote:
dingo wrote:All the details have to be written up the issues of a fair days work still needs to be negotiated. If there is a deal within 7 days it will go to ballot of the membership if there is no deal then the union will notify for strike action and cannot strike later than 20th November
Well lets hope the i's are dotted and the t's crossed this time and we aren't staggering into yet another half-arsed agreement that still festers 4 years on. No roadshow this time lets have a fair and reasonable ballot to the new deal with an honest appraisal that includes a plan B. I have to be honest and say this 11th hour reprieve does not fill me with overwhelming confidence that this deal is going to waver too far from the original.

Lets see the detail in full this time.
Totally agree. Sounds exactly the same only substituting 3 years for 5.