How many fruitless strikes do we have to foolishly participate in, before the wake-up call sounds loud and clear?
Took the last three big strikes, strikes which didn't gain us a single thing, and left us with ever worsening terms and conditions, before I realised what an absolute mug I've been.
Looks like there will be no shortage of folk with money to pour down the toilet, and who believe we should strike only to cause a bit of a nuisance, and not to actually improve our pay and conditions.
That's not the trade unionism I grew up with in the seventies, and will no longer subscribe to it.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
National strike
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
-
Judgee
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 2262
- Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 15:18
Re: National strike
Spedley wrote:Life expectancy has risen by 5 years since I was at school and presumably so has the quality of health. Without raising the retirement age who is going to pay for the average extra 5 years of retirement per person?
Acutually this may be true but the life expectancy of a manual worker is 3 years LESS than than the national average. So seems only fair to me that office workers who actually have a life expectancy of 3 years MORE the national average should pay for us poor souls who flog oursleves into an early grave!
Union what Union? Do we have a union?
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
Re: National strike
Improvements in neonatal care and falling infant mortality could raise life expectancy by twenty years without a single person ever living long enough to claim an extra days pension.
Statistics don't you just love em
Good point about the socioeconomic effect on life expectancy . Apparently your A's and B's will get to screw an extra 17 years out of the pension pots compared to your D or E posties etc.
And that's without taking into account that a lot of them will be putting their feet up at 55.
Statistics don't you just love em
Good point about the socioeconomic effect on life expectancy . Apparently your A's and B's will get to screw an extra 17 years out of the pension pots compared to your D or E posties etc.
And that's without taking into account that a lot of them will be putting their feet up at 55.
Bye
-
oldrangersW12
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 15:16
- Gender: Male
Re: National strike
would never workcomeracing wrote:strikes are no good everybody work to rule finish on time and i mean EVERYBODY.
too many selfish people with an 'i'm alright jack' attitude for that to work i'm afraid.
-
jockstrapp
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 970
- Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 17:58
- Gender: Male
Re: National strike
Who gives a f#ck who pays my pension, I've worked for 49years now and next year I want mine, don't give my money to some useless benefit tosser/imigrant just pay me my dues.Spedley wrote:Life expectancy has risen by 5 years since I was at school and presumably so has the quality of health. Without raising the retirement age who is going to pay for the average extra 5 years of retirement per person?
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: National strike
Pension fund managers down to their last £100 million are they?
Who pays for their retirement?....us.
Who pays for their retirement?....us.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
Gazza90000
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 02 Sep 2007, 11:13
Re: National strike
49 Years - Some people are just plain greedy.jockstrapp wrote:Who gives a f#ck who pays my pension, I've worked for 49years now and next year I want mine, don't give my money to some useless benefit tosser/imigrant just pay me my dues.Spedley wrote:Life expectancy has risen by 5 years since I was at school and presumably so has the quality of health. Without raising the retirement age who is going to pay for the average extra 5 years of retirement per person?![]()
![]()
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72725
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: National strike
...... and some bait rather than debate.Gazza90000 wrote:49 Years - Some people are just plain greedy.jockstrapp wrote:Who gives a f#ck who pays my pension, I've worked for 49 years now and next year I want mine, don't give my money to some useless benefit tosser/imigrant just pay me my dues.Spedley wrote:Life expectancy has risen by 5 years since I was at school and presumably so has the quality of health. Without raising the retirement age who is going to pay for the average extra 5 years of retirement per person?![]()
![]()
BTW just in case your maths and history is as good as your debating skills please remember some points:
1. He is retiring next year after 49 or 50 years that means he started at the GPO/RM in 1962.
2. The school leaving age was raised to 16 in 1964 - 2 years after jockstrap started at RM/GPO.
Perhaps you should be applauding someone who has worked for 49 years rather than trying to get a reaction from people.
I know I do
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
Gazza90000
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 02 Sep 2007, 11:13
Re: National strike
Why should I applaud anyone... I am just giving my opinion , sorry if that does not float ya boat ... The Forum is called Royal Mail CHAT...Or as the Adim is that only when you say...TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Perhaps you should be applauding someone who has worked for 49 years rather than trying to get a reaction from people.
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72725
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: National strike
No you gave your opinion and then I gave my opinion on your opinion (A definition of debate). Thats why its called royalmailCHAT, we are allowed to respond to your posts in a personal capacity. If it was in an Admin Moderator Capacity it would be in Green just like every single one of my posts say.Gazza90000 wrote:Why should I applaud anyone... I am just giving my opinion , sorry if that does not float ya boat ... The Forum is called Royal Mail CHAT...Or as the Adim is that only when you say...TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Perhaps you should be applauding someone who has worked for 49 years rather than trying to get a reaction from people.
Just in case you missed it - the green sentence.





All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.