ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Individual Sorting Standards

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
grubberkick
Posts: 6
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 15:45
Gender: Male

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by grubberkick »

Righto but still nobody has answered the accuracy part of my question. Back at the time of the agreement I'm sure there was a part in it stating they couldn't check them afterwards... ????????????

Or have I had a dream :Very Happy
Tamsky
Posts: 253
Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 13:16
Location: Ayrshire Coast

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by Tamsky »

Hi Grubberkick

There is no accuracy check for the IPS and I'm certain no accuracy check for Prep - but this would seem illogical :crazy: (that doesn't mean there is an accuracy check) :hmmmm
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by stokes11eg »

:shock: At one time, you were allowed 2 mistakes per hundred letters. I don't know ifthis still holds.
grubberkick
Posts: 6
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 15:45
Gender: Male

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by grubberkick »

stokes11eg wrote::shock: At one time, you were allowed 2 mistakes per hundred letters. I don't know ifthis still holds.

No it doesn't hold, there's never been such a test..
The test now is the 1 minute test, the one it took over from approx 8 years ago was, sorting- 500 items in 20 mins with only 4 mistakes allowed..
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by stokes11eg »

:shock: Don't tell me in my 16 years plus with R/M they LIED to me about these tests.!
grubberkick
Posts: 6
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 15:45
Gender: Male

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by grubberkick »

stokes11eg wrote::shock: Don't tell me in my 16 years plus with R/M they LIED to me about these tests.!
Mate, would it really surprise you....they'll bluff their way if they think they can get away with it..
IloveMYredTROLLEY!
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1923
Joined: 02 Apr 2010, 06:54
Gender: Male

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by IloveMYredTROLLEY! »

AlbertoGranado wrote:one of the managers in our office counted the ,mail of a colleague, he claimed that there was slightly more than 700 items and it should take less than 35 minutes to sort, he then said that he GUESSED how many packets and news he had in his drop bag. The formal interview has been done and my friend has been told that the same manager will deicde wether to issue a formal warning or not.
What was the result of this?

How can any sort of disciplinary be based on guesswork? For under-performance, surely that manger needs a precise amount of items that the person sorted in a given time frame? I'm sure a industrial tribunal would have a field day representing the postie in such a case!
speedy
Posts: 87
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 14:12

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by speedy »

I've been tested twice in the space of 5 days. 23 the first time, 26 the second time. Neither test was on an empty frame. Surely now that I've passed I shouldn't be tested anymore?

Just for the record I'm not very popular in managements eyes at the minute and I'm feeling like they are out to get me, and others I may add.
gb93
Posts: 1462
Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
Gender: Male

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by gb93 »

You have shown you have reached the required standard there should be no need to test you again unless you have a very long absence or switch functions for a fair while then return to your office.
If your are tested again or your sorting standards are questioned and you feel agrieved or harrased their are procedures in place to deal with your problem.Not an easy option, but to be frank it either that or put up with things.
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by Himaggen »

Can someone provide proof that there is no agreed full prep rates, our rep believes there is and has been involved in verification of the mail count. The linos have a table which they are using to calculate overall prep rate. You throw your walk up, having the stopwatch paused for non-work activities, (toilets etc.). Then when ready for tie up, the mail count is undertaken and the results checked from the table. If you fail to meet the 'required', i think around 14 items per minute,then the work place coach re-trains you, if after that you fail again its a conduct issue.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32778
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by POSTMAN »

FFS!
I think some of you need to get your area reps involved and if you can your div reps.
Get the s**t sorted once and for all.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32778
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by POSTMAN »

Himaggen wrote:Can someone provide proof that there is no agreed full prep rates, our rep believes there is and has been involved in verification of the mail count. The linos have a table which they are using to calculate overall prep rate. You throw your walk up, having the stopwatch paused for non-work activities, (toilets etc.). Then when ready for tie up, the mail count is undertaken and the results checked from the table. If you fail to meet the 'required', i think around 14 items per minute,then the work place coach re-trains you, if after that you fail again its a conduct issue.
What table!
Tell them to f**k off,see my post above.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
gluteus maximus
Posts: 241
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 15:08
Gender: Male

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by gluteus maximus »

What is the sorting rate now over a minute on the delivery officers own sorting frame, i have been told it is the RM2000
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72713
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Individual Sorting Standards

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

gluteus maximus wrote:What is the sorting rate now over a minute on the delivery officers own sorting frame, i have been told it is the RM2000

The TEST rate IIRC is 25 per minute on a 1 minute test.

There is no individual sorting rate that has been agreed by the Union, but there is an office sorting rate in the planning tools for indoor work, This is different from office to office and is somewhat dependant on their BSI score.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.