ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 278/24 – Raising Concerns-The following bullet points were some of the reasons why we felt it necessary to negotiate a new approach which will address these problems.

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Barnacle
Posts: 2758
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: LTB 278/24 – Raising Concerns-The following bullet points were some of the reasons why we felt it necessary to negotiate a new approach which will address these problems.

Post by Barnacle »

Newandscared wrote:
31 Dec 2024, 09:05
Suggestion would be that next time anything that affects the workers takes place that letters are sent directly to the employees home addresses, it's far to easy for people that know a ballot it forthcoming to remove items or "accidentally" forget to inform people in time. Better still a union rep actually present themselves to the workplace and make sure they speak to all employees. I've been with RM just over 2 months now and still not been approached by my local union rep, or had any probationary period feedback etc....isn't that part of the new joiner package??? (I would ask my LM but I think I'd rather fly under the radar as much as possible because I need reasonable adjustments and need to make sure I keep my job)
Is there a rep in your office or are you one of the offices without a rep?
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Newandscared
Posts: 109
Joined: 21 Nov 2024, 08:12
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 278/24 – Raising Concerns-The following bullet points were some of the reasons why we felt it necessary to negotiate a new approach which will address these problems.

Post by Newandscared »

No idea to be honest. It wasn't brought up in my induction. I'm finding out what I'm supposed to know as I go along. Not the best way to make employees welcome. I don't even have time to book overtime or read the notice boards unless I go into overtime to do it.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 11895
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 278/24 – Raising Concerns-The following bullet points were some of the reasons why we felt it necessary to negotiate a new approach which will address these problems.

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Newandscared wrote:
01 Jan 2025, 14:31
I'm finding out what I'm supposed to know as I go along. Not the best way to make employees welcome.
Been like that for a few years now in both MCs and DOs. You get the "ass covering" stuff like manual handling, fire safety, mail security etc but then it's "here's your work area, here's the work, get on with it"
Newandscared
Posts: 109
Joined: 21 Nov 2024, 08:12
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 278/24 – Raising Concerns-The following bullet points were some of the reasons why we felt it necessary to negotiate a new approach which will address these problems.

Post by Newandscared »

SpacePhoenix wrote:
01 Jan 2025, 15:09
Newandscared wrote:
01 Jan 2025, 14:31
I'm finding out what I'm supposed to know as I go along. Not the best way to make employees welcome.
Been like that for a few years now in both MCs and DOs. You get the "ass covering" stuff like manual handling, fire safety, mail security etc but then it's "here's your work area, here's the work, get on with it"
Yes and you'll find that this lack of training and mentoring, poor pay for our responsibilities, bullying on the forum and at work, split days off and inability to see family for months on end for some staff ....all makes RM a bad place for new starters. If we knew in advance of our start date the things that go on we wouldn't join and it's the new joiners and young people that the company will need.
Barnacle
Posts: 2758
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: LTB 278/24 – Raising Concerns-The following bullet points were some of the reasons why we felt it necessary to negotiate a new approach which will address these problems.

Post by Barnacle »

Newandscared wrote:
02 Jan 2025, 09:07
SpacePhoenix wrote:
01 Jan 2025, 15:09
Newandscared wrote:
01 Jan 2025, 14:31
I'm finding out what I'm supposed to know as I go along. Not the best way to make employees welcome.
Been like that for a few years now in both MCs and DOs. You get the "ass covering" stuff like manual handling, fire safety, mail security etc but then it's "here's your work area, here's the work, get on with it"
Yes and you'll find that this lack of training and mentoring, poor pay for our responsibilities, bullying on the forum and at work, split days off and inability to see family for months on end for some staff ....all makes RM a bad place for new starters. If we knew in advance of our start date the things that go on we wouldn't join and it's the new joiners and young people that the company will need.
RM is a funny onion. It needs the new joiners and the yoof, and yet it does everything to drive them away! But actually, if you get past the first year you’ll be fine. It’s like an initiation process.

Is there someone you can ask about the whereabouts of your union rep? I think speaking to your rep will ease a lot of the nonsense you are coming up against.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Newandscared
Posts: 109
Joined: 21 Nov 2024, 08:12
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 278/24 – Raising Concerns-The following bullet points were some of the reasons why we felt it necessary to negotiate a new approach which will address these problems.

Post by Newandscared »

RM is a funny onion. It needs the new joiners and the yoof, and yet it does everything to drive them away! But actually, if you get past the first year you’ll be fine. It’s like an initiation process.

Is there someone you can ask about the whereabouts of your union rep? I think speaking to your rep will ease a lot of the nonsense you are coming up against.
[/quote]

I emailed them direct and they refuse to talk via email, which is actually the preference of this disabled person.....means I have evidence and something to go back to when I forget. But it's also why people refuse to engage ...because I have evidence if they cock up. Getting through the first year is probably a no go, I'm 2 months in and another 10 months of it feels like a bit much.
hans solo
Posts: 3245
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 278/24 – Raising Concerns-The following bullet points were some of the reasons why we felt it necessary to negotiate a new approach which will address these problems.

Post by hans solo »

The previous agreement wasnt fit for purpose
Neither is cwu executives