ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
What would be the agreement for you is it about pay your hours or times you start finish or the bullying or saving jobs or even pensions their are many things that need to be resolved but what is most important to YOU!.
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16742
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
Work/ life outside work balance.
And obviously the lump sum.
And obviously the lump sum.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
rolf
- Posts: 110
- Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 16:54
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
Why is everybody focusing on a lump sum, you have to vote no, it is not about lump sum it is long term future for one and all, not short term gain please vote no. 
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
rolf wrote:Why is everybody focusing on a lump sum, you have to vote no, it is not about lump sum it is long term future for one and all, not short term gain please vote no.
He was having a laugh.
What is the lump sum anyway?
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
pjthebear
- Posts: 54
- Joined: 22 May 2007, 21:10
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
Long term job security and shorter saturdays!
-
Glenno
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 13:12
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
A fair and balanced work load with more transparancy mixed up with a bit of common sence 
-
flatfoot
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 28 Jan 2008, 19:26
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
im with pj on this job security but satudays are my big concern
-
Godric
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 855
- Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 12:08
- Gender: Male
- Location: The Kingdom of Alba
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
rolf wrote:Why is everybody focusing on a lump sum, you have to vote no, it is not about lump sum it is long term future for one and all, not short term gain please vote no.
well said Comrade, they can stick their deal/sell out up their arse, time to get back out on the street again and this time the union better not f*cking back down again
"Vi har haft århundraden av kärlek och tillit till varandra."
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
25% of what you would have got for colleague share?fishtank wrote:rolf wrote:Why is everybody focusing on a lump sum, you have to vote no, it is not about lump sum it is long term future for one and all, not short term gain please vote no.
He was having a laugh.
What is the lump sum anyway?
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16742
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
Surely as someone who has attended the talks as one of RMC's nominated negotiators you must know what the lump sum is.fishtank wrote: What is the lump sum anyway?
If you don't, then no-one does.
Maybe there isn't one.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
There it is.clashcityrocker wrote:Surely as someone who has attended the talks as one of RMC's nominated negotiators you must know what the lump sum is.fishtank wrote: What is the lump sum anyway?
If you don't, then no-one does.
Maybe there isn't one.
Count it,it's all there.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
Ever wondered where the other 75% will go here is a clue. :cfodvbuk55 wrote:25% of what you would have got for colleague share?fishtank wrote:rolf wrote:Why is everybody focusing on a lump sum, you have to vote no, it is not about lump sum it is long term future for one and all, not short term gain please vote no.
He was having a laugh.
What is the lump sum anyway?
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
I thought the lump sum went with :lfo for he is the sum of all lumps!.clashcityrocker wrote:Surely as someone who has attended the talks as one of RMC's nominated negotiators you must know what the lump sum is.fishtank wrote: What is the lump sum anyway?
If you don't, then no-one does.
Maybe there isn't one.
-
chickenwittle
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
- Gender: Male
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
why are people screaming for a no vote when they havent even seen the agreement lets all have a look and decide to many rumours flying around and it aint about lump sums see the bigger picture
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: WHAT WOULD BE THE AGREEMENT FOR YOU
Well what is your ideal agreement for YOU!.chickenwittle wrote:why are people screaming for a no vote when they havent even seen the agreement lets all have a look and decide to many rumours flying around and it aint about lump sums see the bigger picture