ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Breaks at start of duty
-
bobthepostie
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 24 Mar 2010, 17:41
- Gender: Male
Breaks at start of duty
Out DOM has advised us from next week that part timers break will commence 35 minutes after starting and is to be taken in full. Basically we are expected to to come in at 8:30, tie down and load the van for 9:05 and then take our 30 min break until 9:35. I'm sure I read something on here ages ago stating that breaks were not to be taken just after starting the shift and don't need to be taken in one go i.e i could take 15 in the morning and 15 halfway through if i choose. Can't seem to find anything though that mentions breaks. Any ideas?
-
IcanthelpthewayIam
- Posts: 4067
- Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Breaks at start of duty
What he is trying to do is legal, break after 35 minutes after start of shift is not a break at start of shift from a legal stand point
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72727
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: Breaks at start of duty
zx135 wrote:What he is trying to do is legal, break after 35 minutes after start of shift is not a break at start of shift from a legal stand point
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
Not sure though it fits in with the spirit of "somehwere in the middle" for statutory breaks.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
IcanthelpthewayIam
- Posts: 4067
- Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Breaks at start of duty
may not fit with spirit but does with letter of the law and unfortunately that's what countsTrueBlueTerrier wrote:zx135 wrote:What he is trying to do is legal, break after 35 minutes after start of shift is not a break at start of shift from a legal stand point
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
Not sure though it fits in with the spirit of "somehwere in the middle" for statutory breaks.
-
DB1100
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30
Re: Breaks at start of duty
Do you mean illegal zx135?zx135 wrote:What he is trying to do is legal, break after 35 minutes after start of shift is not a break at start of shift from a legal stand point
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
For we were soldiers once,and young
-
IcanthelpthewayIam
- Posts: 4067
- Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Breaks at start of duty
No perfectly legalDB1100 wrote:Do you mean illegal zx135?zx135 wrote:What he is trying to do is legal, break after 35 minutes after start of shift is not a break at start of shift from a legal stand point
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
-
arnold cheshire
- Posts: 5309
- Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
- Gender: Male
- Location: england
Re: Breaks at start of duty
We have part time coming in at 830 with a break at 910
-
IloveMYredTROLLEY!
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: 02 Apr 2010, 06:54
- Gender: Male
Re: Breaks at start of duty
What about the national agreement of being allowed to take some break off the finish time, if not used?
I think DOM can force OP to take 20mins, satisfying the employment law of a 20min break if working 6 hours or more, but the OP could finish 10mins earlier than their contract finish if they choose not to use the other 10mins break on delivery.
I think DOM can force OP to take 20mins, satisfying the employment law of a 20min break if working 6 hours or more, but the OP could finish 10mins earlier than their contract finish if they choose not to use the other 10mins break on delivery.
-
spiderj
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 969
- Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 07:54
- Gender: Male
- Location: ctp
Re: Breaks at start of duty
Somewhere in the middle
Hmmm
Law relies on probability and precedent
Just after starting would get shot down in tribunal,
But with the new fees and the job market, who amongst the workforce will bring that to a court.
That's what the Dom knows and is relying on,fatigue isn't cured by a break at what is essentially the start.
The accidents will pile up untill they hit an unacceptable financial level.
But its always been that way and won't change anytime soon.
Hmmm
Law relies on probability and precedent
Just after starting would get shot down in tribunal,
But with the new fees and the job market, who amongst the workforce will bring that to a court.
That's what the Dom knows and is relying on,fatigue isn't cured by a break at what is essentially the start.
The accidents will pile up untill they hit an unacceptable financial level.
But its always been that way and won't change anytime soon.
I won
-
DB1100
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30
Re: Breaks at start of duty
Crazy situation.zx135 wrote:No perfectly legalDB1100 wrote:Do you mean illegal zx135?zx135 wrote:What he is trying to do is legal, break after 35 minutes after start of shift is not a break at start of shift from a legal stand point
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
For we were soldiers once,and young
-
IcanthelpthewayIam
- Posts: 4067
- Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Breaks at start of duty
absolutely just pointing out the actual legal situation don't agree with it but that's the way it isDB1100 wrote:Crazy situation.zx135 wrote:No perfectly legalDB1100 wrote:Do you mean illegal zx135?zx135 wrote:What he is trying to do is legal, break after 35 minutes after start of shift is not a break at start of shift from a legal stand point
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
-
BarnsleyLackey
- Posts: 349
- Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 16:07
- Gender: Male
Re: Breaks at start of duty
Isn't, or wasn't there something that stated you must have at least 20 mins after 4 hours work?
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72727
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: Breaks at start of duty
BarnsleyLackey wrote:Isn't, or wasn't there something that stated you must have at least 20 mins after 4 hours work?
Depends whther you mean statutory on contractural.
Statutory breaks are a minimum of 20 minutes if expected to work 6 hours or more and it can be unapid.
Royal Mail breaks are based on attendance length. The longer you work, the more PAID breaks (except Angard) you get.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
bobthepostie
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 24 Mar 2010, 17:41
- Gender: Male
Re: Breaks at start of duty
Thanks for the replies guys. Seems like there's not much I can do. 
-
DB1100
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30
Re: Breaks at start of duty
Thanks zx135,shows a complete disregard for the welfare of the P/T workforce,this is one of the reason's I don't put myself out too much for this company,I have no hesitation in doing a fair days work for a fair days wage,but when they try and lay the guilt trip on me for not bending over backwards to help them out I think of thing's like this.zx135 wrote:absolutely just pointing out the actual legal situation don't agree with it but that's the way it isDB1100 wrote:Crazy situation.zx135 wrote:No perfectly legalDB1100 wrote:Do you mean illegal zx135?zx135 wrote:What he is trying to do is legal, break after 35 minutes after start of shift is not a break at start of shift from a legal stand point
if you are not happy with the change ask your rep to put a stage 1 disagreement in about it
For we were soldiers once,and young