ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Re-pick
-
lilmiss123
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 20:12
- Gender: Female
Re-pick
Hi, I'm relatively new to the royal Mail so have never gone through a re-pick. We have one coming up and apparently we have to write a letter to one of the managers/ union reps regarding a walk we would like to be selected for. I'm just wondering exactly what do I put in this letter is it just a simple case of I would like to put my name forward and that's it?
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16692
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: Re-pick
Who told you you have to write a letter?
Were they pulling your leg?
The walks are put on a board, the most senior goes first and picks a duty, you then go down the seniority list.
Nobody to my knowledge has ever had to write a letter.
Were they pulling your leg?
The walks are put on a board, the most senior goes first and picks a duty, you then go down the seniority list.
Nobody to my knowledge has ever had to write a letter.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
last couple of repicks we've had, you are given a sheet of paper with you're first, second, and third choice of duty. and depending on you're seniority, will probably get one of you're choices. as you are new, and way down the seniority list, you probably will just be left with the crap or end up vicing duties.
-
Mark_Law22
- Posts: 68
- Joined: 20 Jan 2011, 18:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
Hey,lilmiss123 wrote:Hi, I'm relatively new to the royal Mail so have never gone through a re-pick. We have one coming up and apparently we have to write a letter to one of the managers/ union reps regarding a walk we would like to be selected for. I'm just wondering exactly what do I put in this letter is it just a simple case of I would like to put my name forward and that's it?
I thought the same as you first time i tried signing up for a walk. I wrote a lovely little letter saying why i should be picked for all the different walks i was applying for (3 or 4 different ones). Must have been half a page of A4 at least.
The next day i asked a work mate what he had put and he said all you needed to do was put your name, pay number and the walk you are applying for on a piece of paper and give it to a manager. I felt like a right numpty
So i'd think all you need to do is the same. Different offices might have different rules though?
-
Bahia Feliz
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 21:04
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
Is it a whole office 're-pick' or is it some of the vacant duties going up on the wall?lilmiss123 wrote:Hi, I'm relatively new to the royal Mail so have never gone through a re-pick. We have one coming up and apparently we have to write a letter to one of the managers/ union reps regarding a walk we would like to be selected for. I'm just wondering exactly what do I put in this letter is it just a simple case of I would like to put my name forward and that's it?
-
kirstyx
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 147
- Joined: 24 Jul 2012, 16:45
- Gender: Female
Re: Re-pick
My office had our last repick due to the revision last january still not signed off but that's a different story. For us picking a duty we had all the duties showing route maps on boards in a conference room and we were called down one at a time in seniority order. If it's just a vacant duty being advertised just your name and pay no and saying you want to apply for such duty will be sufficient for a letter application.
-
Dorset Plodder
- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
Does anyone actually "Sign" for a Duty anymore? We tend to say someone's "Signed" for it (and they are often Delivering it) but then something happens in the office and....Surprise Surprise that guy is moved onto another Duty. Often with the BS "Well you're the only other person in the office that knows that Duty"!
Well here's an idea try moving some of theses idle buggers around a bit,,,,You know the ones that have been on the same duty for the last 15 years and have NEVER done another duty.
Well here's an idea try moving some of theses idle buggers around a bit,,,,You know the ones that have been on the same duty for the last 15 years and have NEVER done another duty.
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
-
Bahia Feliz
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 21:04
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
Not 'idle buggers' at all pal,some people over 30 years in the job just want to do their own delivery and no others,nothing wrong with that is there?Dorset Plodder wrote: Well here's an idea try moving some of theses idle buggers around a bit,,,,You know the ones that have been on the same duty for the last 15 years and have NEVER done another duty.
-
Altrider
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 81
- Joined: 12 Feb 2013, 17:29
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
If you haven't worked in the private sector before (and I have) then you my friend, may well be in for a nasty shock........as the real world of commerce and business (RM can no longer be regarded as a public service) moves in cut-throat waysBahia Feliz wrote:Not 'idle buggers' at all pal,some people over 30 years in the job just want to do their own delivery and no others,nothing wrong with that is there?Dorset Plodder wrote: Well here's an idea try moving some of theses idle buggers around a bit,,,,You know the ones that have been on the same duty for the last 15 years and have NEVER done another duty.
-
Bahia Feliz
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 21:04
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
If you say so 'my friend'Altrider wrote:If you haven't worked in the private sector before (and I have) then you my friend, may well be in for a nasty shock........as the real world of commerce and business (RM can no longer be regarded as a public service) moves in cut-throat waysBahia Feliz wrote:Not 'idle buggers' at all pal,some people over 30 years in the job just want to do their own delivery and no others,nothing wrong with that is there?Dorset Plodder wrote: Well here's an idea try moving some of theses idle buggers around a bit,,,,You know the ones that have been on the same duty for the last 15 years and have NEVER done another duty.
-
themailman
- Posts: 399
- Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 21:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
Bahia Feliz wrote:Not 'idle buggers' at all pal,some people over 30 years in the job just want to do their own delivery and no others,nothing wrong with that is there?Dorset Plodder wrote: Well here's an idea try moving some of theses idle buggers around a bit,,,,You know the ones that have been on the same duty for the last 15 years and have NEVER done another duty.
In my experience, allowing people the 'right' to never get moved off their duty elevates their feeling of being untouchable.
-
rubberbond
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
Well there is actually. I was thinking about this and I reckon that we are going to have to apply formally for duties in the future,which will be on a suitability,not seniority basis,rightly so as well. It's about time stupid ,archaic practices were stopped in this job.Bahia Feliz wrote:Not 'idle buggers' at all pal,some people over 30 years in the job just want to do their own delivery and no others,nothing wrong with that is there?Dorset Plodder wrote: Well here's an idea try moving some of theses idle buggers around a bit,,,,You know the ones that have been on the same duty for the last 15 years and have NEVER done another duty.
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16692
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: Re-pick
How would this work given that the duties are in theory all equal?rubberbond wrote: I reckon that we are going to have to apply formally for duties in the future,which will be on a suitability,not seniority basis,rightly so as well.
Would postie A be given a flat terrain duty because they wheeze a lot if they have to walk uphill as they smoke 40 a day?
Would postie B be given a duty with a nutcase on it because they are the hardest mofo in the DO?
In what way is anyone more suitable for a duty?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
rubberbond
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Re-pick
The duties are all equal? Where does that happen,nowhere I have ever worked in this organisation is that the case and believe me I am no one office wonder.clashcityrocker wrote:How would this work given that the duties are in theory all equal?rubberbond wrote: I reckon that we are going to have to apply formally for duties in the future,which will be on a suitability,not seniority basis,rightly so as well.
Would postie A be given a flat terrain duty because they wheeze a lot if they have to walk uphill as they smoke 40 a day?
Would postie B be given a duty with a nutcase on it because they are the hardest mofo in the DO?
In what way is anyone more suitable for a duty?
As for the workings , I don't have any specific ideas, that is for greater minds than mine to work out. There no doubt will be a set criteria. From what I can see at the minute ,it's either based on seniority, if you do overtime on a regular basis, or are a management pet . Those of us who don't tick those somewhat dubious boxes ,tend to lose out somewhat, I feel.
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Re-pick
Clash,clashcityrocker wrote:How would this work given that the duties are in theory all equal?rubberbond wrote: I reckon that we are going to have to apply formally for duties in the future,which will be on a suitability,not seniority basis,rightly so as well.
Would postie A be given a flat terrain duty because they wheeze a lot if they have to walk uphill as they smoke 40 a day?
Would postie B be given a duty with a nutcase on it because they are the hardest mofo in the DO?
In what way is anyone more suitable for a duty?
And surely DOMs might as well be selected on a seniority basis because 'suitability' hasn't worked very well.