ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Strategic Involvement

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
ldsposti
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 376
Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 18:43
Gender: Male

Strategic Involvement

Post by ldsposti »

Hi all has anyone got anything on the above subject our plank of a dom seems to think this doe's not apply to him, But from what I understand there is a lot that our rep should be involved in is there a document anywhere that lists what the rep should be involved in, This dom of ours is on a power trip we just need something to stop him in his tracks anyone got any ideas
centenaryman
Posts: 512
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:31
Gender: Male

Re: Strategic Involvement

Post by centenaryman »

our rep has an S I meeting with the d.o.m once a week,,,,seems to be ok by us,,,they discus traffic levels,,,and staffing,,,and any issues we have
mandelsons_toenail
Posts: 1294
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:16
Gender: Male
Location: Outer Hebrides

Re: Strategic Involvement

Post by mandelsons_toenail »

I don't understand the question.

As a rep you need to have your nose in everything
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72727
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Strategic Involvement

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

ldsposti wrote:Hi all has anyone got anything on the above subject our plank of a dom seems to think this doe's not apply to him, But from what I understand there is a lot that our rep should be involved in is there a document anywhere that lists what the rep should be involved in, This dom of ours is on a power trip we just need something to stop him in his tracks anyone got any ideas
It might be in the IR Framework document (Industrial Relations)
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Strategic Involvement

Post by fishtank »

STRATEGIC INVOLVEMENT
Probably the most abused section of the IR Framework agreement.
This is what Lord Sawyer had to say about Strategic Involvement in Royal Mail.

Section 8 of the Industrial Relations Framework commits Royal Mail and the CWU to engage in a full consultation process about issues affecting the future of the business described as “Strategic Involvement”.

It contains an explicit recognition of the importance of “regular, timely and effective”
consultation between Royal Mail and the CWU at all decision-making levels.
It acknowledges that this will, among other things, “increase commitment to the success of Royal Mail”; “enable Royal Mail, its Unions and its employees to meet changing customer requirements speedily and effectively”; make the implementation of change “smoother”; and encourage a more constructive relationship between Royal Mail and the Unions.

It emphasises that such consultation requires “real commitment in terms of time, resource and behaviours”. There then follows an outline procedure for regular consultative meetings at national, divisional, Area and unit levels. This part of the IR Framework says all the right things and although the procedure which it sets out is fairly skeletal it would be entirely adequate to ensure good and effective consultation given the will on both sides.

Unfortunately the evidence which we have heard is that implementation has been exceedingly patchy. CWU attendance at national Strategic Involvement meetings has been irregular. At Area and unit level meetings have occurred, and been effective, where both parties had the necessary will.

Elsewhere, they have lapsed or been purely formulaic, with managers using the meetings not as an opportunity for real dialogue but simply telling union representatives what they intend to do.

If anything it's worse now,especially at unit level than it has ever been. :cuppa
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16689
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Strategic Involvement

Post by clashcityrocker »

ldsposti wrote: This dom of ours is on a power trip we just need something to stop him in his tracks anyone got any ideas
Isn't that why you go to disagreement?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
celerycelery
Posts: 675
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 16:44

Re: Strategic Involvement

Post by celerycelery »

Doms don't want a weekly meeting with the rep as they prefer to manage an office on a day to day basis, even hour to hour basis rather than plan ahead which would make it slightly easier. My theory is from the doms I have seen they can't manage their own dinner let alone the office and a weekly meeting with the rep would show them up.