ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
-
Sergeant Blast
- Posts: 140
- Joined: 24 Feb 2010, 22:09
- Gender: Male
- Location: Up North
Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Will RM ever take the well being of its delivery staff seriously? The revisions have led us to walk unrealistic distances each day. We all seem to be complaining about painful knees, hips, backs etc. Yet have RM introduced better footwear to protect our bodies? NO! It's about time we were provided with shoes that cushion and protect our feet. CAT trainers are crap and the others aren't much better and are too heavy for summer use. Of course none provided have ever been waterproof. How about getting a company like ECCO to supply our footwear? It's a bloody disgrace that this company are literally crippling its delivery staff. It's about time the union forced action on this issue too. I'm fed up of living in almost constant pain. Enough is enough!
-
Captain Scarlet
- Posts: 322
- Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 15:23
- Location: Fifer
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
If enough people complain to the Union Outdoor Sec. will he not do something about it, my shoes are lasting 6 months on delivery 
-
tb35
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 19:00
- Gender: Male
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
your lucky my cat trainers last me two months!!!!Captain Scarlet wrote:If enough people complain to the Union Outdoor Sec. will he not do something about it, my shoes are lasting 6 months on delivery
-
Sergeant Blast
- Posts: 140
- Joined: 24 Feb 2010, 22:09
- Gender: Male
- Location: Up North
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Well I've just emailed Hayley Nutley about this. She is the senior secretary on the outdoor section. If others do the same maybe they will realise how strongly many of us feel about this. Email address is hnutley@cwu.org
-
spen
- Posts: 531
- Joined: 18 Jan 2011, 19:53
- Gender: Male
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Nobody in my do has been able to get any shoes/cats for months,,no matter what size you want there always out of stock. Were wearing our own footwear at the mo
-
krussel
- Posts: 5300
- Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
- Gender: Male
- Location: Out on the streets.
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
We once were given a genuine pair of Clarkes £50 shoes. I saw them in the shop and other than a logo stamped in the leather they were the same. Thet were great both light and waterproof. Everyone was more than happy with them and no one complained. They did wear out quickly but had good grip in the wet.
Of course once RM found out they could offer us much cheaper rubbish they were withdrawn and we have had sub standard rubbish ever since.
Of course once RM found out they could offer us much cheaper rubbish they were withdrawn and we have had sub standard rubbish ever since.
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
-
Brain Fury
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 664
- Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Not true actually. Clarkes might have been £50 plus in the shops but RM didn't pay anything like that for them. The reason they and the DMs were withdrawn was because they weren't slip resistant enough. The replacements weren't any cheaper. RM was always going to be on a loser with trainers because they aren't designed to be worn all day every day.krussel wrote:We once were given a genuine pair of Clarkes £50 shoes. I saw them in the shop and other than a logo stamped in the leather they were the same. Thet were great both light and waterproof. Everyone was more than happy with them and no one complained. They did wear out quickly but had good grip in the wet.
Of course once RM found out they could offer us much cheaper rubbish they were withdrawn and we have had sub standard rubbish ever since.
-
Beaker54
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 15 Oct 2009, 18:46
- Gender: Female
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Most of our office have the CAT trainers and as our rounds are 4 to 5 hours they last about 2 months in the wet they are lethal when will Royal Mail stop cutting corners and get us some decent footwear getting us cheap crap must be costing them a fortune
-
beria
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 30 Apr 2012, 05:36
- Gender: Male
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
The answer is AMMO boots! 
-
P13
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 14:35
- Gender: Male
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Your delivery must be too short if they are lasting 6 monthsCaptain Scarlet wrote:If enough people complain to the Union Outdoor Sec. will he not do something about it, my shoes are lasting 6 months on delivery
-
DB1100
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Burnt with a spoon and bulled.beria wrote:The answer is AMMO boots!
For we were soldiers once,and young
-
lhb
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 18:20
- Gender: Male
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Althought RM have always said there is nothing wrong with the Cat trainers, they are/were trialing 2 new types of waterproof trainer recently.
A few months ago I asked my DOM for new Cat trainers, the reply was 'NO, you've had your ration'. Luckily my Line manger returned from holiday, asked why I was wearing worn out shoes, and ordered me new Cats. I can only assume the the cost of footware comes out of my DOMS bonus. Probably the same reason he refuses to pay docket.
A few months ago I asked my DOM for new Cat trainers, the reply was 'NO, you've had your ration'. Luckily my Line manger returned from holiday, asked why I was wearing worn out shoes, and ordered me new Cats. I can only assume the the cost of footware comes out of my DOMS bonus. Probably the same reason he refuses to pay docket.
-
DB1100
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
Only trouble with waterproof footwear is it makes your feet sweat really bad,and that can be worse than having wet feet.I cannot see royal mail having winter and summer trainers so it will be terrible in summer.lhb wrote:Althought RM have always said there is nothing wrong with the Cat trainers, they are/were trialing 2 new types of waterproof trainer recently.
A few months ago I asked my DOM for new Cat trainers, the reply was 'NO, you've had your ration'. Luckily my Line manger returned from holiday, asked why I was wearing worn out shoes, and ordered me new Cats. I can only assume the the cost of footware comes out of my DOMS bonus. Probably the same reason he refuses to pay docket.
For we were soldiers once,and young
-
ploppy
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 11 May 2013, 18:11
- Gender: Male
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
They were not waterproof either and you had to learn to walk again in them.Until you had got the hang of them you either minced or spent most of the time on your arse.beria wrote:The answer is AMMO boots!
-
Silly Sarah
- Posts: 112
- Joined: 06 May 2010, 22:13
- Gender: Female
- Location: wild west
Re: Footwear Not Fit For Purpose
I ache every day after my delivery. I would rather buy a decent pair myself. Of course if I then fall or trip I risk being disciplined. RM bang on about H&S and reducing accidents etc but we know they don't really care, its just more propaganda.
What have I done to deserve this?