ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Revision Rules ?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
kendo1
Posts: 217
Joined: 07 Mar 2010, 12:21
Gender: Male

Revision Rules ?

Post by kendo1 »

Can some show me on here where the CWU rules are for office revisions.

If say walk B is asborbed by walk A ,with the majority of delivery points of B now forming the majority of NEW -WALK A

Both walks currentley have duty holders.

Walk B Duty holder is displaced,but their is a vacant walk in the office that they are happy to do.

The NEW WALK A current duty holder has more seneority than B and says that under CWU RULES the fact his walk has received 70% of another walk ,the official Duty holder should be B ,who was origanaly displaced.

Neither person wants the new walk as is exceptional big.
union reps back senior man .

So Can the senior man ,simply walk away from his walk even though it has substantialy altered ?
Does the junior man have to accept being pushed onto this new walk ,even if 70% of it is made up of his old walk.

Where could I find the exact rules.
The Management will accept any recomendation from the CWU rep .

Does the Junior man have any rights at all ?

Looks very unfair to me ,but Duty holder on A appears to be very well infomed by someone with a very good knowledge of union rules,thats not to say he is correct just sounds like it .

I just want to find the correct rules and ensure fair play
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Revision Rules ?

Post by fishtank »

If there no longer is a Duty B then Duty B is displaced.
It doesn't matter how senior he is,he is the displaced duty holder.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
IcanthelpthewayIam
Posts: 4067
Joined: 26 May 2009, 13:37
Gender: Male

Re: Revision Rules ?

Post by IcanthelpthewayIam »

if its a full office revision there shouldnt be a problem as all walks should be going up for signing
kendo1
Posts: 217
Joined: 07 Mar 2010, 12:21
Gender: Male

Re: Revision Rules ?

Post by kendo1 »

May be a resign in a few weeks but that is in the future.

NEED TO KNOW WHAT RULES SAY ,NOT WHAT PEOPLE MAY THINK IS RIGHT,WILL BE A BATTLE.

Thanks
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Revision Rules ?

Post by fishtank »

kendo1 wrote:
NEED TO KNOW WHAT RULES SAY ,NOT WHAT PEOPLE MAY THINK IS RIGHT,WILL BE A BATTLE.
I told you what the rules were.
Read the MTSF agreement if you don't believe me.
The definition of a surplus employee is clearly stated.
A permanent employee whose current job has disappeared or will disappear in a known time frame.
Whose duty has disappeared....A or B?
It doesn't matter where his duty has gone or if he's more senior or if he can piss higher...if his job/duty has gone...he is displaced...he..is...surplus.
It isn't rocket science.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share