Himaggen wrote:If I have jumped to conclusions which were or are unfair/incorrect then for that I also apologise, (I am unaware just yet what those are, but will be happy to hear them if you see fit to respond).
All the below are your conclusions of me and the way I work .
1. Stop wasting your voice on here and do it in your Delivery Office.
2. It's no good just hearing a postie make their point and not adding your weight behind it, stand up and say something.
3.. Then you would feel less guilty about skipping up and down each street with your one and a half bundles in your hand and no trolley
4.The only reason I can think of off the top of my head why you would change the system is to perform more work within the allotted time or to complete all work before your finish time. What this actually means is that you would end up over-performing, which is detrimental behaviour.
5.I'll tell you why, because you knew it was wrong!
6.. The walks which you've stated were re-introduced post revision were not as a result of you doing it your own way, they were the result of failure doing it their way .
7.Altering it helps nobody but yourself, in the short term, and an every man for himself attitude is a major contributing factor to our current situation.
8. you will not get the achievable workload you are crying out for.
9.You still don't get it and have confirmed what I'd guessed .
So I''ve come to the conclusion that you've concluded that I'm wasting my voice on here and not saying anything in the delivery office .
I'm over performing and guilt ridden .
I knew that splitting our loops into two was wrong . Altering the loops helps nobody but myself . One loop has 120 flats and so far no one as insisted they want to tackle them on their own , but maybe I still have to work with someone like you.
The walks weren't re-introduced because posties where doing it RM's way , the office is a free for all and as long as the vans are used and posties go out in pairs everything after that is up to the individual , the duties were to big , with bags or trolleys , full stop .
I'm not crying out for the achievable workload , from my point of view I don't care if it's unachievable , if I want to work over I will , if I don't I won't . I'm just trying to point out to posties that in my opinion , it's not the P&L way of working that's at fault but the worlkoad itself .
The I've confirmed what I guessed bit really sums you up and you have dug a hole for yourself .
I know I said I wouldn't respond to another one of your posts unless it was constructive to the forum but I couldn't let it go and had to point out where you were a little out of order .