Ive never seen so many flats !!!!!

[krussel]

This has to be the most heavy new year ive ever seen. We have flats (mainly holiday broch, sky and Saga) stacked everywhere in the office.
I have a personal stack of about 4 ' waiting to go out in the morning, god knows how many i will get after the ips.
My delivery took 4hr 45min today due to the weight but no one is cutting off

Never seen it so bad before. How is it elsewhere ??

[arnold cheshire]

its always magazines holiday brochures saga catalogue stuff time of year

[krussel]

its always magazines holiday brochures saga catalogue stuff time of year

Yeah but not on this scale

[DGP1]

Fooking Saga..........................don't even fit the largest letterboxes now

[Stormproof]

Fooking Saga..........................don't even fit the largest letterboxes now

They are going where the money is, the ones that have'nt lost their final salary pensions.

[krussel]

There's another one which offers "river cruises" has a picture of a long barge floating hotel on the front. Had dozens of the smegger. Its far, far worse than last year and that was bad.

[Steviea34]

Very very heavy, on top of this we still have network failures from before xmas,
still delivering large amount of pkts and presents. I cannot fathom where all these
failures have been hiding. I would love to know what % of xmas mails failed to
reach people in time for xmas.

[taurus88]

We have loads of flats piled on yorks, all big thick catalogues. All from before Xmas. I left a pile of big mailsort ones behind today because there was just no way, the weight was already too much. Many of these catalogues weigh in excess of 1kg. Do you guys 739 them if they won't go through?

[TrueBlueTerrier]

We have loads of flats piled on yorks, all big thick catalogues. All from before Xmas. I left a pile of big mailsort ones behind today because there was just no way, the weight was already too much. Many of these catalogues weigh in excess of 1kg. Do you guys 739 them if they won't go through?

Yes - The 739 now has a tick box for them.

[krussel]

We have loads of flats piled on yorks, all big thick catalogues. All from before Xmas. I left a pile of big mailsort ones behind today because there was just no way, the weight was already too much. Many of these catalogues weigh in excess of 1kg. Do you guys 739 them if they won't go through?

Yes - The 739 now has a tick box for them.

Why have you crossed out "sorry" ??

[Stormproof]

We have loads of flats piled on yorks, all big thick catalogues. All from before Xmas. I left a pile of big mailsort ones behind today because there was just no way, the weight was already too much. Many of these catalogues weigh in excess of 1kg. Do you guys 739 them if they won't go through?

Yes - The 739 now has a tick box for them.

Glad I don't work in Callers anymore. Imagine trying to find that recorded packet by the number!

[DGP1]

We have loads of flats piled on yorks, all big thick catalogues. All from before Xmas. I left a pile of big mailsort ones behind today because there was just no way, the weight was already too much. Many of these catalogues weigh in excess of 1kg. Do you guys 739 them if they won't go through?

Yes - The 739 now has a tick box for them.

Glad I don't work in Callers anymore. Imagine trying to find that recorded packet by the number!

DW 8064 9346 4GB - looks fine to me, maybe your eyes are going the same way as your knees

[Stormproof]

We have loads of flats piled on yorks, all big thick catalogues. All from before Xmas. I left a pile of big mailsort ones behind today because there was just no way, the weight was already too much. Many of these catalogues weigh in excess of 1kg. Do you guys 739 them if they won't go through?

Yes - The 739 now has a tick box for them.

Glad I don't work in Callers anymore. Imagine trying to find that recorded packet by the number!

DW 8064 9346 4GB - looks fine to me, maybe your eyes are going the same way as your knees

That may say DW 8064 9316 4GB

[TrueBlueTerrier]

its not mine - its one I found doing a google search -

[DGP1]

its not mine - its one I found doing a google search -

Is that why it's an old docket