POSTMAN wrote: Plenty of info on here on the failed ones,so would rather not have you post about that in here.
Can we only have ones that are working or ones that you feel will get better in time.
If your revision is NOT working then please use the thread below...
OFFICES WITH A FAILING REVISION.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Are there any offices out there that have had a successful revision that involved delivery methods and/or WSM..........those "self starter" ones don't count. The only ones that come under 2010 and Beyond would be using HCTs, Park and Loop and LCTs.
Last edited by POSTMAN on 04 Jan 2011, 18:12, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Added quote
Reason: Added quote
-
mr deeds
- Posts: 212
- Joined: 18 Sep 2008, 17:23
- Gender: Female
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
no success here hcts take too long van rounds very hit and miss...office full of mail ...dom pulling his hair out...mail left or loads of docket...sorry i know the post said "working revisions" hey ho!
(north west)
(north west)
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Well according to a well known oracle, there has been 600 revisions, now surely out of such a large number.........still only one third of DOs though, there must be one which has had a genuine revision that HAS worked.
-
london sub
- Posts: 397
- Joined: 29 Jan 2009, 16:24
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Answers on a postcard.
I would like to hear some good news though, that an office some where has succeeded without to many hiccups along the way.
I would like to hear some good news though, that an office some where has succeeded without to many hiccups along the way.
-
red1968
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 121
- Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 22:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Durham, seen the DVDdvbuk55 wrote:Well according to a well known oracle, there has been 600 revisions, now surely out of such a large number.........still only one third of DOs though, there must be one which has had a genuine revision that HAS worked.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
By the end of October or 6 months after the deal was ratified only around 150 revisions had been implemented.dvbuk55 wrote:Well according to a well known oracle, there has been 600 revisions, now surely out of such a large number.........still only one third of DOs though, there must be one which has had a genuine revision that HAS worked.
I assume none were implemented during Christmas pressure.
Are we supposed to believe that 450+ revisions were implemented in November then?
I'm not buying.
Shifting a few streets about does not a revision make...not in my eyes anyway.
Major change?....well the answer's in the question.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
I must admit I was a bit surprised at the total myself but then I am not in the "loop" so to speak...............fishtank wrote:By the end of October or 6 months after the deal was ratified only around 150 revisions had been implemented.dvbuk55 wrote:Well according to a well known oracle, there has been 600 revisions, now surely out of such a large number.........still only one third of DOs though, there must be one which has had a genuine revision that HAS worked.
I assume none were implemented during Christmas pressure.
Are we supposed to believe that 450+ revisions were implemented in November then?
I'm not buying.![]()
Shifting a few streets about does not a revision make...not in my eyes anyway.
Major change?....well the answer's in the question.
-
jockstrapp
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 970
- Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 17:58
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Check out the monthly COURIER lots of smiley faces and successfull revisions??????????????/

-
ldsposti
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 376
- Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 18:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Why not ask billy hayes,dave ward, and bob gibson they are the ones who backed this whole idea.

-
Roy Mayall
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 16:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Several were implemented during the Xmas rush. All of them were a complete disaster.fishtank wrote:By the end of October or 6 months after the deal was ratified only around 150 revisions had been implemented.dvbuk55 wrote:Well according to a well known oracle, there has been 600 revisions, now surely out of such a large number.........still only one third of DOs though, there must be one which has had a genuine revision that HAS worked.
I assume none were implemented during Christmas pressure.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Do we need to go to such exalted heights.........there is a man who knows the national position apparently and has the ear of the leadership and moreldsposti wrote:Why not ask billy hayes,dave ward, and bob gibson they are the ones who backed this whole idea.![]()
![]()
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
ldsposti wrote:Why not ask billy hayes,dave ward, and bob gibson they are the ones who backed this whole idea.![]()
![]()
Not quite, they needed acceptance from the PEC and then the membership.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
Yes quite - they did back the scheme regardless of the PEC and coerced the membership into acceptance by untrue claims of bonus payments, no plan B and then the media circus.Big Daz wrote:ldsposti wrote:Why not ask billy hayes,dave ward, and bob gibson they are the ones who backed this whole idea.![]()
![]()
Not quite, they needed acceptance from the PEC and then the membership.
-
steven100
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: 09 Aug 2009, 12:35
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices with a SUCCESSFUL revision
All have been a success, in their own ways.
