After 3 months of knowing the delivery supplement was coming & 3 weeks of it being inforce some people still just don't seem able to grasp the idea of it.And I believe it could be the name of the supplement that confuses some.
It is not a supplement for delivering d2d or for any kind of "delivery" at all.It is a supplement for people who work in a delivery office whether you deliver mail or not.
Maybe it should be called a DELIVERY OFFICE SUPPLEMENT this may be clearer for some to understand.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
-
gb93
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
- Gender: Male
Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
-
pickaname
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 20:24
Re: Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
In that case Im asking why do we recieve the supplement?
I wager it will be removed in 3 years.
I wager it will be removed in 3 years.
-
gb93
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
- Gender: Male
Re: Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
It is a new way of paying out same money,which the CWU believes will be to the benefit of all eventually.pickaname wrote:In that case Im asking why do we recieve the supplement?
I wager it will be removed in 3 years.
With also the aim to incorporate into basic pay eventually.
Apparantly or so I believe anyway as the thinking is it is harder to take away money from our basic pay or allowances everybody gets than it is to remove other allowances that some and eventually most don't get.
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
-
wimpdet
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 16:28
- Gender: Male
Re: Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
Do we receive the pay rise with the 'supplement' added to the basic salary or just on the basic salary - anyone know? 
-
Straight4ward
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: 25 Oct 2009, 14:32
- Gender: Male
Re: Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
From the 2010 & Beyond doc.
The supplement will increase in value as agreed in basic pay rises.
Leaving aside the grammer, yes the supplement will rise when basic pay is increased.
The supplement will increase in value as agreed in basic pay rises.
Leaving aside the grammer, yes the supplement will rise when basic pay is increased.
"Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway."
-
gb93
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
- Gender: Male
Re: Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
Next 2 pay rises 2011 & 2012 basic pay & supplement will both rise and they will remain separate.wimpdet wrote:Do we receive the pay rise with the 'supplement' added to the basic salary or just on the basic salary - anyone know?
There you go 2 answers on the same subject on different threads.
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
That wont apply to RM as we have our own seperate revenue stream, other than UK GOV owning all the shares there is no difference betwen us and a private company due to the restructuring of RM by succesive governments.
-
pokos27
- Posts: 657
- Joined: 15 Apr 2010, 19:32
- Gender: Male
Re: Should The Delivery Supplement Be Renamed
is meal relief next to go.