ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

What are the consequences of a low turnout?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
MinisterofCucumber
Posts: 806
Joined: 15 Dec 2009, 22:18
Gender: Male

What are the consequences of a low turnout?

Post by MinisterofCucumber »

Dingo and his mates have expressed the view that a high turnout is important for this ballot.

They have refused to answer my question on why non letters members are being balloted on proposed MtSF changes but not being balloted on the proposed 10% performance standard.

Why do they want a high turnout?
"You wanna f**k with me? Okay. You wanna play rough? Okay. Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana
chewi
Posts: 124
Joined: 27 Sep 2009, 16:19
Gender: Male

Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?

Post by chewi »

because the higher the turnout, the greater the validity of the answer. You should be encouraging everybody with a vote to use it regardless of whether it's yes or no
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?

Post by Big Daz »

This agreement covers employees in CWU represented grades in Royal Mail Letters Operations, Logistics and Network, Engineers, Fleet Maintenance Services and Royal Mail International.

No mention of POL and PF or GLS

Both parties commit to the deployment of WCM, which will be the subject of consultation at all levels and will be consistent with existing national agreements. The rollout which started in mail centres in January 2009 will complete in mail centres and RDCs by September 2011. In delivery offices WCM is still being developed and will be completed in all delivery offices and network hubs by September 2012.

Again no mention of POL and PF or GLS


Sorry M o C but i think you are wrong, other than MTSF everything is RML only IMHO.
MinisterofCucumber
Posts: 806
Joined: 15 Dec 2009, 22:18
Gender: Male

Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?

Post by MinisterofCucumber »

Why is it called World Class performance in the proposed agreement and not just World Class Mail?

World Class implies global implementation.

Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?
"You wanna f**k with me? Okay. You wanna play rough? Okay. Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?

Post by dvbuk55 »

MinisterofCucumber wrote:Why is it called World Class performance in the proposed agreement and not just World Class Mail?

World Class implies global implementation.

Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?
You mean Mr Miyagi - lay it on pretty thick :Very Happy
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?

Post by DGP1 »

dvbuk55 wrote:
MinisterofCucumber wrote:Why is it called World Class performance in the proposed agreement and not just World Class Mail?

World Class implies global implementation.

Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?
You mean Mr Miyagi - lay it on pretty thick :Very Happy
Wax on - wax off :wink:
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?

Post by dvbuk55 »

DGP1 wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:
MinisterofCucumber wrote:Why is it called World Class performance in the proposed agreement and not just World Class Mail?

World Class implies global implementation.

Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?
You mean Mr Miyagi - lay it on pretty thick :Very Happy
Wax on - wax off :wink:
Thanks for that DGP - but it wasn't wax I was thinking thats been laid on pretty thick with this agreement :wink: