I actually had the manager this morning state it's a poor deal for delivery staff this morning whilst higher echelon's of the C.W.U. are pushing it through total madness, so it seems we all agree it's a poor deal yet!!! are advised to accept.
Surely this cannot be the case a reasounding 'NO' must surely make someone take notice?
The rep reckons it will all be pushed through anyway regardless of the vote outcome so take your pennies now , I personally will be voting NO have no problems with the idea of change if it is needed, however we are massively busy in our office 2-3 packet sacks per day can count on one hand the times a year I take less than 3 d2d's, maybe in other areas this isn't the case and that is where the extra work is needed?
Seems to me the worst aspect aside losing money in the guise of a payrise is the lack of any limits at all in the agreement cap lifted on d2d's and delivery spans, presumably we are supposed to trust RM will not take the piss out of this!!!!
Rep also said the d2d's being date sensitive is not in the agreement, yet when I asked the manager if you still want longs and shorts why is Saturday one of the long days, his reason was exactly the d2d's designed specifically tailored for saturdays when ppl will be at home eating their breakfast when they land on the doorstep, pmsl at 3pm presumably.
I feel that the strikes only served to get the C.W.U. back into the picture which would be great if they actually used that to argue our case nbot so they could push RM'S a seems the case now, managers in WTL sessions need not have any details on the deal or try to sell it to us as the C.W.U. are on it for them.
Would have been acceptable if the union had just stated we are in a weak position and for now this is the best we can do, and be open to the public what this really means to your postie instead of letting it look as if we are getting a payrise, we are not stupid and can see this however the public will not be looking naturally as deeply into the deal only the headline facts given.
Our rep is leaving soon and I would love to get involved not sure ecxactly whats involved but also wouldn't want to part of an extension to RM whilst pretending to be aiding the workforce.
I'm hopeful the rest in the office will not follow the rep's advice but fear after today many will just follow the line given,we are screwed anyway so may as well get a few quid first for our trouble.