but this is worse.
Contributing to this website for just two weeks has made me question what 'type' of postie I am. Stating that I am neither for nor against this strike, but that I am prepared to carry on working regardless, has led to all sorts of accusations from other members of this site. One or two openly doubt whether I am actually a postie.
Well I am a postie. But what 'type' of postie? This is a fast changing thought, but to put it bluntly I think that I am not the type of postie that worries about what the customer thinks of the service. Don't get me wrong, I take pride in my own work, but as long as I am doing what the company asks of me (never easy) then I go home content.
I think that it is somehow difficult for some of my fellow posties to recognise that as one of their own I can truly and honestly admit that the strike does not interest me. To me, being a postie is just a job like any other. For most of my youth I did not believe that I would ever take on such a job, mainly because I did not think that I would cope with the physical and endurance aspects of the work. However, at a time in my life when I was unsatisfied with the direction my career was taking (in other words, hating the line of work that I was pursuing) I decided upon a drastic measure and did the unthinkable. And here I am. And yes, I was right, the work is heavy and hard, and not much fun. So why don't I quit, because unexpectedly the job suits me, and actually I believe that if a job tests you to the max every day then that job is good for you.
So you see, the difficult nature of the job, while once being a turn-off, is now actually spurring me on to become something better. I relish the challenge. And of course I am not alone in enjoying what I do, but it seems that some posties are striking because they feel that the company is asking too much of us.
I am a certain 'type' of postie, and I hope we can all agree that not all of us think the same way. To my simple mind, I get paid to work. And after that brainwave, I focus all my energy upon my duty. I'm not interested in striking or improving my lot. I take what I'm given and I'm grateful. If I ever again reach the point where I become dissatisfied with what I am doing with my life, then I will move on to something else. I just have never been taught that if I do not like what I am given then I must ask the people who gave it to me to get their act together or else I will refuse their gift in the future until they do. I have been taught, or at least I have learned, that if I do not like what I am given then I must look elsewhere for something better.
All of that means that I will continue to look to my employer for my next days work. I'm sorry if that offends anyone who feels strongly opposed to my way of thinking, but please don't think that I shall be working during the strike out of spite. I shall be working because it's what I want to do. You may refuse to work because that is what you want to do. But lets not fall out over it. I can understand the opposing point of view that is leading some people out on strike, to the extent that I don't doubt that changes in working practises have changed the job we do beyond recognition. But I've not been in the job long enough to have noticed a dramatic change, though I feel that there is a tide of change at the moment that is leading to a bigger ask of us posties, yet not so big an ask that I do not feel able to respond (yet).
This strike is a big headache for someone taking the position that I am, where I am hoping that it will all blow over without having to play a part in it. The more it drags on, the bigger my headache, because as the strength of feeling grows on either side my position will increasingly be scrutinised, and it is already difficult to try to justify - just look at the length I am going to.
Having now posted an original topic, I know that this will be open to abuse and ridicule, but as you may read I’m not really in the mood for joking