We have capacity issues and the managers will be diverting parcels towards usSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 01:27Yodel have got capacity issues so some retailers will be diverting some of their postings over to RMTopperGas wrote: ↑07 Dec 2024, 18:53It's baffling how RM just allows Amazon to dump all their excess on them, so have to contend with additional Black Friday items from their usual suppliers and all Amazon's excess on top, and expect a handful of additional agency staff at each DO to deal with the excess.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Offices 'officially' in trouble?
-
kazardaimenu
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: 13 Apr 2022, 19:11
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4593
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
This sounds like a good way to get on your manager’s s**t list though if the report is not anonymous.Oscar_Grouch wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 07:33May I suggest using the raising concerns feature on the people app?bo72 wrote: ↑07 Dec 2024, 19:35My entire walk failed today. It was recorded as only a third failing. When I questioned it was told the boss wouldn't be happy if he heard the entire walk failed.
I have done this recently. The result was a good number of stressful (for the local management) visits from senior types from outside of the operations chain of command.
Questions were asked. Correct procedures were explained, management was taught to count.
We suddenly rightfully appeared on the list for a few days until the OPL's hand was forced into providing some support.
We're still in a mess but it feels more honest...for now.
-
Oscar_Grouch
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 01 Nov 2024, 19:55
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
It was anonymous, and I could have remained more anonymous.
"The investgator" asks any specific questions to the reporter via a central team. And the reporter responds likewise.
As far as I'm aware none of the managers involved know it was me.
Like many others I have been dubious of the process. But I have become angry enough at the complete and utter dishonesty that appears across the operations management that I realised that in all good conscience I can no longer be a passive bystander, compliant through silence and as such completely complicit in the goings on.
The ones making my life hell on the other hand are the union representatives, for daring to undermine their 'authority' and embarrassing them. By achieving more positive for the unit with one anonymous report and a couple of not anonymous emails to the CEO and others much higher up than us 'lowly' OPGs or even the Coms and Dom's.
"The investgator" asks any specific questions to the reporter via a central team. And the reporter responds likewise.
As far as I'm aware none of the managers involved know it was me.
Like many others I have been dubious of the process. But I have become angry enough at the complete and utter dishonesty that appears across the operations management that I realised that in all good conscience I can no longer be a passive bystander, compliant through silence and as such completely complicit in the goings on.
The ones making my life hell on the other hand are the union representatives, for daring to undermine their 'authority' and embarrassing them. By achieving more positive for the unit with one anonymous report and a couple of not anonymous emails to the CEO and others much higher up than us 'lowly' OPGs or even the Coms and Dom's.
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3829
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
Reading this and your previous post I also wondered about the anonymity of it so having checked on the people app I see you can access it either through the app which I assume won't be anonymous or there's a phone number so probably the option to choose if you wanted to avoid painting a target on your back.Oscar_Grouch wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 14:23It was anonymous, and I could have remained more anonymous.
"The investgator" asks any specific questions to the reporter via a central team. And the reporter responds likewise.
As far as I'm aware none of the managers involved know it was me.
Like many others I have been dubious of the process. But I have become angry enough at the complete and utter dishonesty that appears across the operations management that I realised that in all good conscience I can no longer be a passive bystander, compliant through silence and as such completely complicit in the goings on.
The ones making my life hell on the other hand are the union representatives, for daring to undermine their 'authority' and embarrassing them. By achieving more positive for the unit with one anonymous report and a couple of not anonymous emails to the CEO and others much higher up than us 'lowly' OPGs or even the Coms and Dom's.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
You would have to be absolutely anonymous or forever marked.ted_e_bear wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 14:42Reading this and your previous post I also wondered about the anonymity of it so having checked on the people app I see you can access it either through the app which I assume won't be anonymous or there's a phone number so probably the option to choose if you wanted to avoid painting a target on your back.Oscar_Grouch wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 14:23It was anonymous, and I could have remained more anonymous.
"The investgator" asks any specific questions to the reporter via a central team. And the reporter responds likewise.
As far as I'm aware none of the managers involved know it was me.
Like many others I have been dubious of the process. But I have become angry enough at the complete and utter dishonesty that appears across the operations management that I realised that in all good conscience I can no longer be a passive bystander, compliant through silence and as such completely complicit in the goings on.
The ones making my life hell on the other hand are the union representatives, for daring to undermine their 'authority' and embarrassing them. By achieving more positive for the unit with one anonymous report and a couple of not anonymous emails to the CEO and others much higher up than us 'lowly' OPGs or even the Coms and Dom's.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
bo72
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 21 Feb 2012, 15:39
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
My main concern about reporting it is the bloke that was making the report. He is an OPG just like me and was no doubt following orders. I can see if the s*** hits the fan he will be made the scap goat.LouBarlow wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 10:08This sounds like a good way to get on your manager’s s**t list though if the report is not anonymous.Oscar_Grouch wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 07:33May I suggest using the raising concerns feature on the people app?bo72 wrote: ↑07 Dec 2024, 19:35My entire walk failed today. It was recorded as only a third failing. When I questioned it was told the boss wouldn't be happy if he heard the entire walk failed.
I have done this recently. The result was a good number of stressful (for the local management) visits from senior types from outside of the operations chain of command.
Questions were asked. Correct procedures were explained, management was taught to count.
We suddenly rightfully appeared on the list for a few days until the OPL's hand was forced into providing some support.
We're still in a mess but it feels more honest...for now.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32588
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
We're sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your understanding. We will regularly update customers on the offices most impacted here:
88
Abingdon DO (OX13 and OX14)
Basingstoke DO (RG21-RG26 and RG28)
Bethnal Green DO (E2, E8 and E9)
Bow DO (E3)
Burnham On Sea DO (TA8 and TA9)
Canterbury DO (CT1 - CT6)
Carterton DO (OX18)
Clevedon DO (BS21 and BS49)
Coalville DO (LE67)
Fareham DO (PO14 - PO17)
Finchley Church End DO (N3)
Frome DO (BA11)
Gosport DO (PO12 and PO13)
Hyde DO (SK13, SK14 and SK16)
Keith DO (AB55)
Leicester East DO (LE2, LE5 and LE7)
Margate DO (CT7 - CT9)
Oxford East DO (OX3, OX4, OX33, OX44 and OX49)
Ongar DO (CM5)
Plymouth North DO (PL2 and PL3)
Plympton DO (PL7)
Portsmouth DO (PO1 – PO6)
Radstock DO (BA3)
Reading East DO (RG4 - RG6 and RG10)
Swan House DO (LE1, LE3, LE7, LE8, LE9, LE19 and LE95)
Thatcham DO (RG18 and RG19)
Tonbridge DO (TN1-TN5 and TN9-TN12)
Wallingford DO (OX10 and OX49)
Wantage DO (OX12)
Waterlooville DO (PO7 and PO8)
Whetstone DO (N20)
Wilmslow DO (SK9)
Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO)
A Morse code abbreviation meaning "Love and kisses"
88
Abingdon DO (OX13 and OX14)
Basingstoke DO (RG21-RG26 and RG28)
Bethnal Green DO (E2, E8 and E9)
Bow DO (E3)
Burnham On Sea DO (TA8 and TA9)
Canterbury DO (CT1 - CT6)
Carterton DO (OX18)
Clevedon DO (BS21 and BS49)
Coalville DO (LE67)
Fareham DO (PO14 - PO17)
Finchley Church End DO (N3)
Frome DO (BA11)
Gosport DO (PO12 and PO13)
Hyde DO (SK13, SK14 and SK16)
Keith DO (AB55)
Leicester East DO (LE2, LE5 and LE7)
Margate DO (CT7 - CT9)
Oxford East DO (OX3, OX4, OX33, OX44 and OX49)
Ongar DO (CM5)
Plymouth North DO (PL2 and PL3)
Plympton DO (PL7)
Portsmouth DO (PO1 – PO6)
Radstock DO (BA3)
Reading East DO (RG4 - RG6 and RG10)
Swan House DO (LE1, LE3, LE7, LE8, LE9, LE19 and LE95)
Thatcham DO (RG18 and RG19)
Tonbridge DO (TN1-TN5 and TN9-TN12)
Wallingford DO (OX10 and OX49)
Wantage DO (OX12)
Waterlooville DO (PO7 and PO8)
Whetstone DO (N20)
Wilmslow DO (SK9)
Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO)
A Morse code abbreviation meaning "Love and kisses"
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3829
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
f**k me is this the worst it's ever been ?
-
Mr Rush
- Posts: 2860
- Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
It might be the worst it's ever been and yet it represents 0.2% of DOs. Bonuses all round.
Presumably that's the fallout from Wednesday-Thursday-Friday; reported as three consecutive days on Saturday and nailed to the door today.
Presumably that's the fallout from Wednesday-Thursday-Friday; reported as three consecutive days on Saturday and nailed to the door today.
The machine stops.
-
funkflex55
- Posts: 630
- Joined: 04 Sep 2022, 22:58
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
If the official figure is 88 then the unofficial figure is probably 488. Based on what I'm seeing at my office. Those 88 offices need to get better at creative accounting.
Edit - 88 postcode sections
Edit - 88 postcode sections
-
Jaggs
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 18 Jan 2011, 11:18
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
The DO I work at should have been on this list for the last fortnight but has not appeared on it so it definitely isn't an accurate representation of DOs that are failing
-
Clappedoutpostie
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
Same, boxes of mech just stacked up next to the frames. It’s not like Covid when there was nobody to cover the duty’s it’s just the fact there is no point putting it into the frame as just doing packets on the duty’s take u into overtime. Worst I have ever seen it.
-
Bowiefan
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 21 Dec 2017, 14:52
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
I just look at this list as an indicator of how few offices have managers honest and/or naive enough to report the genuine level of USO failure. The fact that it's a surprise that more than a handful have appeared this time around is telling.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32588
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
We're sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your understanding. We will regularly update customers on the offices most impacted here:
104
Abercarn DO (NP11)
Abingdon DO (OX13 and OX14)
Basingstoke DO (RG21-RG26 and RG28)
Bethnal Green DO (E2, E8 and E9)
Bordon DO (GU35)
Bow DO (E3)
Burnham On Sea DO (TA8 and TA9)
Canterbury DO (CT1 - CT6)
Carterton DO (OX18)
Clevedon DO (BS21 and BS49)
Coalville DO (LE67)
Dunstable DO (LU5 and LU6)
Fareham DO (PO14 - PO17)
Finchley Church End DO (N3)
Folkestone DO (CT 18, CT19 and CT20)
Frome DO (BA11)
Gosport DO (PO12 and PO13)
Havant DO (PO9 and PO10)
Keith DO (AB55)
Kendal DO (LA8 and LA9)
Kingswood DO (BS15 and BS30)
Lanark DO (ML8 and ML11)
Leicester East DO (LE2, LE5 and LE7)
Margate DO (CT7 - CT9)
Ongar DO (CM5)
Oxford East DO (OX3, OX4, OX33, OX44 and OX49)
Plymouth North DO (PL2 and PL3)
Plympton DO (PL7)
Portsmouth DO (PO1 – PO6)
Radstock DO (BA3)
Reading East DO (RG4 - RG6 and RG10)
Swan House DO (LE1, LE3, LE7, LE8, LE9, LE19 and LE95)
Thatcham DO (RG18 and RG19)
Tonbridge DO (TN1-TN5 and TN9-TN12)
Wallingford DO (OX10 and OX49)
Wantage DO (OX12)
Waterlooville DO (PO7 and PO8)
Weston-super-Mare DO (BS22, BS23 and BS24)
Whetstone DO (N20)
Woodbridge DO (IP12 and IP13)
Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO)
The number of Corinthian columns in the Temple of Olympian Zeus, the largest temple ever built in Greece.
104
Abercarn DO (NP11)
Abingdon DO (OX13 and OX14)
Basingstoke DO (RG21-RG26 and RG28)
Bethnal Green DO (E2, E8 and E9)
Bordon DO (GU35)
Bow DO (E3)
Burnham On Sea DO (TA8 and TA9)
Canterbury DO (CT1 - CT6)
Carterton DO (OX18)
Clevedon DO (BS21 and BS49)
Coalville DO (LE67)
Dunstable DO (LU5 and LU6)
Fareham DO (PO14 - PO17)
Finchley Church End DO (N3)
Folkestone DO (CT 18, CT19 and CT20)
Frome DO (BA11)
Gosport DO (PO12 and PO13)
Havant DO (PO9 and PO10)
Keith DO (AB55)
Kendal DO (LA8 and LA9)
Kingswood DO (BS15 and BS30)
Lanark DO (ML8 and ML11)
Leicester East DO (LE2, LE5 and LE7)
Margate DO (CT7 - CT9)
Ongar DO (CM5)
Oxford East DO (OX3, OX4, OX33, OX44 and OX49)
Plymouth North DO (PL2 and PL3)
Plympton DO (PL7)
Portsmouth DO (PO1 – PO6)
Radstock DO (BA3)
Reading East DO (RG4 - RG6 and RG10)
Swan House DO (LE1, LE3, LE7, LE8, LE9, LE19 and LE95)
Thatcham DO (RG18 and RG19)
Tonbridge DO (TN1-TN5 and TN9-TN12)
Wallingford DO (OX10 and OX49)
Wantage DO (OX12)
Waterlooville DO (PO7 and PO8)
Weston-super-Mare DO (BS22, BS23 and BS24)
Whetstone DO (N20)
Woodbridge DO (IP12 and IP13)
Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO)
The number of Corinthian columns in the Temple of Olympian Zeus, the largest temple ever built in Greece.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32588
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?
We're sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your understanding. We will regularly update customers on the offices most impacted here:
116
Abercarn DO (NP11)
Abingdon DO (OX13 and OX14)
Basingstoke DO (RG21-RG26 and RG28)
Bethnal Green DO (E2, E8 and E9)
Bordon DO (GU35)
Burnham On Sea DO (TA8 and TA9)
Camberley DO (GU15, GU16 and GU17)
Canterbury DO (CT1 - CT6)
Carterton DO (OX18)
Clevedon DO (BS21 and BS49)
Clogher SPDO (BT70, BT75, BT76 and BT77)
Coalville DO (LE67)
Dunstable DO (LU5 and LU6)
Fareham DO (PO14 - PO17)
Finchley Church End DO (N3)
Folkestone DO (CT 18, CT19 and CT20)
Frome DO (BA11)
Gosport DO (PO12 and PO13)
Harwich DO (CO12)
Havant DO (PO9 and PO10)
Keith DO (AB55)
Kendal DO (LA8 and LA9)
Kingswood DO (BS15 and BS30)
Lanark DO (ML8 and ML11)
Leicester East DO (LE2, LE5 and LE7)
Margate DO (CT7 - CT9)
Mid Rhondda Ganol DO (CF39 and CF40)
Ongar DO (CM5)
Oxford East DO (OX3, OX4, OX33, OX44 and OX49)
Plymouth North DO (PL2 and PL3)
Plympton DO (PL7)
Porthcawl DO (CF36)
Portsmouth DO (PO1 – PO6)
Radstock DO (BA3)
Reading East DO (RG4 - RG6 and RG10)
Sandhurst DO (GU46 and GU47)
Swan House DO (LE1, LE3, LE7, LE8, LE9, LE19 and LE95)
Thatcham DO (RG18 and RG19)
Tonbridge DO (TN1-TN5 and TN9-TN12)
Wallingford DO (OX10 and OX49)
Wantage DO (OX12)
Waterlooville DO (PO7 and PO8)
Weston-super-Mare DO (BS22, BS23 and BS24)
Whetstone DO (N20)
Woodbridge DO (IP12 and IP13)
Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO)
There are 116 ternary Lyndon words of length six, and 116 irreducible polynomials of degree six over a three-element field, which form the basis of a free Lie algebra of dimension 116.
116
Abercarn DO (NP11)
Abingdon DO (OX13 and OX14)
Basingstoke DO (RG21-RG26 and RG28)
Bethnal Green DO (E2, E8 and E9)
Bordon DO (GU35)
Burnham On Sea DO (TA8 and TA9)
Camberley DO (GU15, GU16 and GU17)
Canterbury DO (CT1 - CT6)
Carterton DO (OX18)
Clevedon DO (BS21 and BS49)
Clogher SPDO (BT70, BT75, BT76 and BT77)
Coalville DO (LE67)
Dunstable DO (LU5 and LU6)
Fareham DO (PO14 - PO17)
Finchley Church End DO (N3)
Folkestone DO (CT 18, CT19 and CT20)
Frome DO (BA11)
Gosport DO (PO12 and PO13)
Harwich DO (CO12)
Havant DO (PO9 and PO10)
Keith DO (AB55)
Kendal DO (LA8 and LA9)
Kingswood DO (BS15 and BS30)
Lanark DO (ML8 and ML11)
Leicester East DO (LE2, LE5 and LE7)
Margate DO (CT7 - CT9)
Mid Rhondda Ganol DO (CF39 and CF40)
Ongar DO (CM5)
Oxford East DO (OX3, OX4, OX33, OX44 and OX49)
Plymouth North DO (PL2 and PL3)
Plympton DO (PL7)
Porthcawl DO (CF36)
Portsmouth DO (PO1 – PO6)
Radstock DO (BA3)
Reading East DO (RG4 - RG6 and RG10)
Sandhurst DO (GU46 and GU47)
Swan House DO (LE1, LE3, LE7, LE8, LE9, LE19 and LE95)
Thatcham DO (RG18 and RG19)
Tonbridge DO (TN1-TN5 and TN9-TN12)
Wallingford DO (OX10 and OX49)
Wantage DO (OX12)
Waterlooville DO (PO7 and PO8)
Weston-super-Mare DO (BS22, BS23 and BS24)
Whetstone DO (N20)
Woodbridge DO (IP12 and IP13)
Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO)
There are 116 ternary Lyndon words of length six, and 116 irreducible polynomials of degree six over a three-element field, which form the basis of a free Lie algebra of dimension 116.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.