Delivery Duty Design Principles:Doc

[janitor]

Sorry RM don't do binding agreements.

[BELIAL]

And that is why you will always be underpaid and exploited. But fair do's if that is what you think you deserve ,and most of you do ,then that is what you get You can lead a horse to water ,but you can't make it think

voted yes cos they would have used executive action anyway, atleast we have binding agreements now driven by health and safety.

Like you said "simples",

[TrueBlueTerrier]

And that is why you will always be underpaid and exploited. But fair do's if that is what you think you deserve ,and most of you do ,then that is what you get You can lead a horse to water ,but you can't make it think

voted yes cos they would have used executive action anyway, atleast we have binding agreements now driven by health and safety.

Like you said "simples",

Similar logic was used by the Italian Fascists during the 2nd World War. "We surrendered because the enemy was going to attack us anyway."

However, I would be interested to know how H&S is driving the 2010 Agreement because I certainly don't recognise that from what I read, blogged and posted on/about.