ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Your £300 Lump Sum

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by Brain Fury »

Dorset Plodder wrote:The problem with sending out this stuff on a daily basis is that everything is treated as propaganda. I believe that was RMs intention...not to inform the workforce of relevant facts. If they wanted to do that they should have condensed the information into manageable pamphlets that people would have read. Instead it was all treated as BS and consigned to File 13 by a lot of Posties. Even the interesting bits like how to order extra shares (hidden in the middle of that big red book) :whistle

A lot of people are also adverse to reading nowadays so is it any wonder that they ask questions, which may already have been answered in a RM letter, from a source they trust like RMC? :hmmmm
I don't think you'll find anyone including managers that doesn't think it's been overdone (being desk based I've been getting at least one e-mail every day on top of the printed stuff!). And yes some of it was selling a point of view but some of it was simply informational. I also think the pension material was some of the worst communication I've ever seen - totally unintelligible.

However, we've had a full range of communications from Courier, WTLL, posters, leaflets, pamphlets up to the big red book and for some people none of it seems to have gone in. As I say, some of the communications could have been better but there comes a point when people have to help themselves. I'm not saying I am surprised but you have to contrast the derision the "propaganda" receives and the delight expressed in ignoring it all with some people's misunderstanding and ignorance on the key issues.
Chelseablue
Posts: 2172
Joined: 19 Aug 2013, 14:33
Gender: Female

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by Chelseablue »

What about fliers for the public asking them to back us ,, informing them the reasons why we're going out and I mean All the reasons every door done
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by dvbuk55 »

Chelseablue wrote:What about fliers for the public asking them to back us ,, informing them the reasons why we're going out and I mean All the reasons every door done
I'm afraid you over estimate vox populi, 72% of joe public didn't agree with privatisation and so what support do you think they can offer
Dorset Plodder
Posts: 4351
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by Dorset Plodder »

As a business that's meant to specialise in communications we are crap at communicating! :Very Happy

There is such a wide divide in this business between "Us" and "Them" that for a successful future RM really need to put in a LOT of effort to restore faith. The current climate of B & H and unrealistic workloads has a lot to do with Posties simply binning anything that comes from Management, it may be seen a cynical attitude but you've got to ask the question, "Who has fostered this cynical attitude amongst the workforce"? Most posties I know just want to turn up, do a reasonable days work and get paid for it! :pray
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32702
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by POSTMAN »

Hitcher wrote:Today our union rep told us that the £300 was made of three separate £100 payments - one being the Christmas bonus - I thought I read it had nothing to do with those payments?

Confused.
https://www.myroyalmail.com/news/nation ... um-offer-0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72561
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Oooo thanks for posting that postman

Interesting - or not :hmmmm

Title of page

The £300 lump sum on offer* <<<<< notice the asterix


*The £300 is a specific sum being discussed under the proposed agreement for employees in CWU represented grades in Core Operations, Logistics, Engineers, Fleet Maintenance Services, RMSS and Royal Mail International. Separate negotiations will take place for other CWU grade employees within Royal Mail and Parcelforce Worldwide as per current arrangements.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32702
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by POSTMAN »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Oooo thanks for posting that postman

Interesting - or not :hmmmm

Title of page

The £300 lump sum on offer* <<<<< notice the asterix


*The £300 is a specific sum being discussed under the proposed agreement for employees in CWU represented grades in Core Operations, Logistics, Engineers, Fleet Maintenance Services, RMSS and Royal Mail International. Separate negotiations will take place for other CWU grade employees within Royal Mail and Parcelforce Worldwide as per current arrangements.

I also edited the 1st post of this thread with the highlights in a while back.

Just need 100% conformation (brain is not what it used to be)that there is no £300 before I do something for the front page of the site.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by k979aaa »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Oooo thanks for posting that postman

Interesting - or not :hmmmm

Title of page

The £300 lump sum on offer* <<<<< notice the asterix


*The £300 is a specific sum being discussed under the proposed agreement for employees in CWU represented grades in Core Operations, Logistics, Engineers, Fleet Maintenance Services, RMSS and Royal Mail International. Separate negotiations will take place for other CWU grade employees within Royal Mail and Parcelforce Worldwide as per current arrangements.
Discussed means not agreed as yet so you may go in loose all self respect and not gain anything in monetary terms while selling out your own shooting your selves in the foot is what I would call it.
bertieboy
Posts: 56
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:53
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by bertieboy »

radford wrote:So we go on strike lose a days pay and £300 ,do the sums who can afford to lose money.The time to strike is after the 3 year agreement when we get our shares.Are you going out because some thug from London tells you its not a good deal.Most of the country are laughing at us and say its a good deal.
Is Radford your maiden name Moya? :sad:
Dorset Plodder
Posts: 4351
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by Dorset Plodder »

Unfortunately the message is not getting through! :sad: There's still Posties (Probably thousands) out there that think they're going to get the money if they ignore the Strike! :arrrghhh Pity Billy hadn't put something in the recent letter about the Ballot Results. :d'oh!
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
fly-catchers
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 573
Joined: 05 Oct 2008, 16:38
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by fly-catchers »

I never expect anything extra from RM until it is in my bank. And them half expect them to take it back later! :crazy:
arnold cheshire
Posts: 5309
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
Gender: Male
Location: england

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by arnold cheshire »

dvbuk55 wrote:People talk like £300 is a kings ransom; take tax, insurance and prorata into consideration and it's cock all - I spent almost £300 on two front tyres a couple of weeks ago with fitting and balancing.
130 quid two decent new tyres
barrowc
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 383
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 01:36
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by barrowc »

Chelseablue wrote:What about fliers for the public asking them to back us ,, informing them the reasons why we're going out and I mean All the reasons every door done
That's difficult logistically. The CWU would either have to pay to send it as PPI (which would cost several million) or try and book it as a door to door (which would cost a fortune and RM might refuse it anyway). Alternatively they would be looking at volunteers to go round every door and deliver them in their own time.

What you can't do is deliver non-Royal Mail items during your working hours. That's just a conduct case waiting to happen
Pete22
Posts: 127
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 16:53
Gender: Male
Location: Cook-coo land

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by Pete22 »

Brain Fury wrote:The £300 (if it ever appears) is separate from any other payments. However, it is part of the offer made by RM that the CWU has rejected and given that it's only payable to those who do not strike it's quite possible it won't be in the final agreement anyway. Don't spend it yet. The union rep should have known all that.

A colleague of mine asked a (very) senior manager about the amount of information (some say propaganda) that is being pumped out by RM. The answer was that it's because the facts are not getting through to people. Even given the huge cynicism about the material and the glee with which people announce they don't read it, it is hard to argue when so much of the debate is characterised by people not understanding the basics e.g the £300 offer, the post from the guy that said that the pension issue was that we had to make increased contributions etc.
That was a proposal in the recent past that was thrown out as a non starter by the union , it was on the table nearly 6 months ago and I do understand the debate. :speak to the hand
Brain Fury
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 664
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 18:03
Gender: Male

Re: Your £300 Lump Sum

Post by Brain Fury »

Pete22 wrote:
Brain Fury wrote:The £300 (if it ever appears) is separate from any other payments. However, it is part of the offer made by RM that the CWU has rejected and given that it's only payable to those who do not strike it's quite possible it won't be in the final agreement anyway. Don't spend it yet. The union rep should have known all that.

A colleague of mine asked a (very) senior manager about the amount of information (some say propaganda) that is being pumped out by RM. The answer was that it's because the facts are not getting through to people. Even given the huge cynicism about the material and the glee with which people announce they don't read it, it is hard to argue when so much of the debate is characterised by people not understanding the basics e.g the £300 offer, the post from the guy that said that the pension issue was that we had to make increased contributions etc.
That was a proposal in the recent past that was thrown out as a non starter by the union , it was on the table nearly 6 months ago and I do understand the debate. :speak to the hand
Hitcher and his union rep didn't.