ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
659 revisions so far
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: 659 revisions so far
Well it certainly wont be my figure generating a imposing physical presence that scares the planner into submission. I'm rapidly turning into Little Daz

-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: 659 revisions so far
Give over BD you've not been conned into dieting by the missus - I can see it all now, especially in your neck of the woods - lettuce for breakfast, lunch and dinner quaffed down with mineral spring water - still of course................even CO2 has calories apparently.Big Daz wrote:Well it certainly wont be my figure generating a imposing physical presence that scares the planner into submission. I'm rapidly turning into Little Daz![]()
![]()
On a serious note though good luck with the revisions - I'm pretty sure you'll be clued up on the tools BUT they have a habit of suddenly finding some obscure install you haven't heard of.
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16733
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: 659 revisions so far
Or they just ignore you and the IR framework and carry on regardless.dvbuk55 wrote:
On a serious note though good luck with the revisions - I'm pretty sure you'll be clued up on the tools BUT they have a habit of suddenly finding some obscure install you haven't heard of.
And then expect you to sign it off to give it a thin veneer of union agreement.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: 659 revisions so far
Or as in our case the rep wouldn't sign it off but the Area Rep did - it's pretty much in the bag once the planners involved.clashcityrocker wrote:Or they just ignore you and the IR framework and carry on regardless.dvbuk55 wrote:
On a serious note though good luck with the revisions - I'm pretty sure you'll be clued up on the tools BUT they have a habit of suddenly finding some obscure install you haven't heard of.
And then expect you to sign it off to give it a thin veneer of union agreement.
-
arnold cheshire
- Posts: 5309
- Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
- Gender: Male
- Location: england
Re: 659 revisions so far
tell him to f offBig Daz wrote:A planner has finally arrived at my D.O
-
billyboy123
- Posts: 125
- Joined: 10 Nov 2011, 18:31
- Gender: Male
Re: 659 revisions so far
there may be 659 completed but how many are working? let us know if your office revision is working 
-
bandit650
- Posts: 880
- Joined: 14 Aug 2007, 15:42
- Gender: Female
Re: 659 revisions so far
billyboy123 wrote:there may be 659 completed but how many are working? let us know if your office revision is working
None i would say, i keep waiting with bated breath just to see if anyone would stick there and say yeah ours is working then explain how they got it to that.
-
bigcol
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 21 Jun 2010, 13:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: Officially the worst DO
Re: 659 revisions so far
Ours appears to be pretty much 'working'. The answer is simple. A lot of the new walks are the same as the old or even shorter. The problems occur with the few that are much longer.bandit650 wrote:billyboy123 wrote:there may be 659 completed but how many are working? let us know if your office revision is working
None i would say, i keep waiting with bated breath just to see if anyone would stick there and say yeah ours is aworking then explain how they got it to that.
-
bandit650
- Posts: 880
- Joined: 14 Aug 2007, 15:42
- Gender: Female
Re: 659 revisions so far
The problem in ours is that they keep trying but the walks were to big before they started, this is from previous revisions,so we don't stand a chance.
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: 659 revisions so far
Everybody has to remember these words................'the computer says it can be done'
And this new one we've been getting 'it's nationally agreed tools'
And this new one we've been getting 'it's nationally agreed tools'
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
dre33dd
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 04 Mar 2010, 19:05
- Gender: Male
Re: 659 revisions so far
if you are clever you can get a good revision in...we still have all our bikes and no shared vans...we never work over our times and get little or no hassle...but do the members appreciate all the hard work that was put in??? NO..
having a decent planner in helps and having a rep with his or her eye on the ball really helps...
lazy revision=disaster
having a decent planner in helps and having a rep with his or her eye on the ball really helps...
lazy revision=disaster
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: 659 revisions so far
Some failed revisions have nothing to do with laziness.dre33dd wrote:if you are clever you can get a good revision in...we still have all our bikes and no shared vans...we never work over our times and get little or no hassle...but do the members appreciate all the hard work that was put in??? NO..
having a decent planner in helps and having a rep with his or her eye on the ball really helps...
lazy revision=disaster
Some offices and areas are managed by complete tossers and some by semi decent managers.
Some of the tossers have swapped areas with the decent managers lately.
Some areas have had,are having or will have a culture shock.
There are no good revisions...only bad revisions that haven't happened yet.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
crazyshrew
- Posts: 584
- Joined: 19 Jun 2011, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Coastal, South West
Re: 659 revisions so far
We had a pre revision brief this morning
We were informed that once we are up and running (hopefully not literally) we should only be completing within our contracted hours about 1/3rd of the time - the revisions are designed to fail (at least) 8 months of the year!
my question is this if the revisions are deigned to fail, and it seems so many are...
...shouldn't they really be deemed a success?
I apologise for this brain teaser, it's just I'm struggling to get my head round it
We were informed that once we are up and running (hopefully not literally) we should only be completing within our contracted hours about 1/3rd of the time - the revisions are designed to fail (at least) 8 months of the year!
my question is this if the revisions are deigned to fail, and it seems so many are...
...shouldn't they really be deemed a success?
I apologise for this brain teaser, it's just I'm struggling to get my head round it
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: 659 revisions so far
Using the low model week and flexing up,a revision is deemed to be working if the volunteers match the cut offs and no-one is being forced,pressured,intimidated or bullied into working over...and the work gets cleared daily...using the proper equipment...and members are taking their breaks and starting on time.crazyshrew wrote:We had a pre revision brief this morning
We were informed that once we are up and running (hopefully not literally) we should only be completing within our contracted hours about 1/3rd of the time - the revisions are designed to fail (at least) 8 months of the year!![]()
my question is this if the revisions are deigned to fail, and it seems so many are...
...shouldn't they really be deemed a success?
I apologise for this brain teaser, it's just I'm struggling to get my head round it
Sound likely?
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: 659 revisions so far
Most revisions that I can see are designed to fail, if you make a duty that is 100% and based on a low model week then any increase or slight disruption in the mail will result in a failure, still, I just don't care anymore, I have 8 hours to work a day (or 7 hours 48 minutes) and I won't be working any more than that.crazyshrew wrote:We had a pre revision brief this morning
We were informed that once we are up and running (hopefully not literally) we should only be completing within our contracted hours about 1/3rd of the time - the revisions are designed to fail (at least) 8 months of the year!![]()
my question is this if the revisions are deigned to fail, and it seems so many are...
...shouldn't they really be deemed a success?
I apologise for this brain teaser, it's just I'm struggling to get my head round it
And if the planners ever turn up then it would be a start.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio