ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
krussel
Posts: 5292
Joined: 26 Jan 2009, 18:03
Gender: Male
Location: Out on the streets.

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by krussel »

We are already hurting the customer on a daily basis by the lateness of absorbed deliveries. Last week I was delivering to a parade of shops at 1.30pm. Last year that mail would have been run up with a driver and delivered by 9.30am. Five years ago it would have been delivered by 7.30am and waiting on the mat when they opened the shop.
If a business complains about the lateness of its delivery they are simply offered a chance to take out a timed delivery slot at a cost of over £8 a day. :shock: :shock:

With complete privatization around the corner I can only see it getting worse with the withdrawal of the universal service obligation which will mean not only will they be getting mail later but at an even greater cost. :arrrghhh
Rows of houses all bearing down on me........I can feel their blue hands touching me.......All these things in all positions.........All these things will one day take control..........
peejay14
Posts: 90
Joined: 18 Oct 2009, 11:57
Gender: Male

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by peejay14 »

I don't think that it would be fair of me to accuse you of breaking my job by striking, so I don't think it is fair for you to accuse me of breaking your strike by working. I respect your decision to strike, and I know that it is not aimed at hurting me (although it does, because it puts at risk everything). Please respect my decision to work, because I do not do it to harm your strike (although it does, because it goes its own small way to defeating the purpose of your strike). Sorry about that, but I guess that's life; we don't all get things our own way. Without agreement, there is no progress.

I think that going on strike is a regrettable last resort, like detonating a bomb. This occurs when all other less damaging options have been exhausted (have they?) and when the attempt to resolve the situation using common sense has FAILED.

I'm on no-one's side in this war except my own, because I agree with neither side. If the union wins through industrial action, I will take none of the credit. If the company wins by breaking the strike, I will take none of the credit, though perhaps plenty of stick. If both lose, and I lose MY JOB (worst case scenario) as a consequence, then I will take none of the blame. If both win, by reaching an agreement, then hip hip hooray :Very Happy .
axeman
Posts: 1733
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by axeman »

and if every one was like 'peejay' as some friends of mine, mr Ben.Dover and Letsby Avinyou said recently were ''shafted'' thank goodness were not all like this :arrrghhh
rhino49
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1644
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 21:50
Gender: Male
Location: At home with my feet up

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by rhino49 »

Peejay - the principle behind industrial action is not that it forces the agreement you want but that it forces AN agreement that ends the status quo.
The stronger the unity of either side, the sooner an agreement, however near or far from your objectives, is reached and peace reigns. Sitting on the fence or indeed not supporting the side you hope will benefit to some degree is denying your responsibilities, not only to your colleagues but ultimately to yourself.
We wish to serve - but we will not be servile
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72293
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

peejay14 wrote:I don't think that it would be fair of me to accuse you of breaking my job by striking, so I don't think it is fair for you to accuse me of breaking your strike by working.
Strikebreaker definition A strikebreaker (sometimes derogatorily called a scab) is a person who works despite an ongoing strike. Strikebreakers are usually individuals who are not employed by the company prior to the trade union dispute, but rather hired prior to or during the strike to keep production or services going. "Strikebreakers" may also refer to workers (union members or not) who cross picket lines to work.

I think "Strikebreaker" is a lot more polite and preferred way to describe working through a strike, than others that are seem by some as B&H.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.May use chatgp to generate posts
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support
Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
Retired
antcpfc
Posts: 626
Joined: 18 Sep 2007, 17:25

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by antcpfc »

peejay14 wrote:
I will take none of the credit. If the company wins by breaking the strike, I will take none of the credit, though perhaps plenty of stick. If both lose, and I lose MY JOB (worst case scenario) as a consequence, then I will take none of the blame. If both win, by reaching an agreement, then hip hip hooray :Very Happy .
And any benefits gained FOR YOU you will not want to take either. :hmmmm Last time we left a load of gift aid forms around the office for the strikebreakers .They were happy with their original money so we thought they may want to donate the extra that WE fought for.Funny none used them.Perhaps your morals are better and you will. :Applause
Slider tool. Lol.
Ernie Shoe
Posts: 93
Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 16:15
Gender: Male

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by Ernie Shoe »

Peejay.
No offence BUT:
Some of you comments have made me want to vommit.

No offence intended, honest.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by fishtank »

Ernie Shoe wrote:Peejay.
No offence BUT:
Some of you comments have made me want to vommit.

No offence intended, honest.

I don't mind long posts,i don't even mind comments that make me want to vomit.
I'm just bored with the same old "I'm torn in two" post hijack. :cuppa

No offence intended,again.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
k979aaa
Posts: 12570
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by k979aaa »

For some cleaning their immediate superiors asses with their tongue's is beneficial in climbing the ladder which is perched upon those shoulders of their fellow workers one and all can just about bare the manager but those that creep up that ladder to faun should all be frowned upon!.
peejay14
Posts: 90
Joined: 18 Oct 2009, 11:57
Gender: Male

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by peejay14 »

At the forthcoming talks, I will be supporting... ACAS. But positions are so entrenched, that I fear things are beyond repair. To try and describe any position other than that of the determined striker on here, is to walk into a hornet's nest. Over the years, have relations between staff and management deteriorated so badly? If so, then something needs to give. Maybe the recent spat was just the tip of the iceberg, and beneath the surface lies the real danger.
flyinmachine
Posts: 26
Joined: 26 Jul 2009, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by flyinmachine »

peejay14 wrote:At the forthcoming talks, I will be supporting... ACAS. But positions are so entrenched, that I fear things are beyond repair. To try and describe any position other than that of the determined striker on here, is to walk into a hornet's nest. Over the years, have relations between staff and management deteriorated so badly? If so, then something needs to give. Maybe the recent spat was just the tip of the iceberg, and beneath the surface lies the real danger.

Honestly mate who cares you need to chill out ! Everyone's entitled to there own opinion but its as if your looking for some kind of conflict. Every thread i go onto about all different topics ! it seems you've already been there posting the same thing chill fella !!
peejay14
Posts: 90
Joined: 18 Oct 2009, 11:57
Gender: Male

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by peejay14 »

I didn't realise that posties were such a militant bunch. In my office it looked like we were just getting on with it, and it still does, yet to a man/woman we walked out (yes, including me, I thought I had no choice until I received RM's 'Back to Work' plan). I don't think many of us hope for much out of the coming talks, or new what to expect out of the strike, there was just an overall feeling of discontent that seemed to excuse the Union's orders. I believe that our office now feels that it could do without the hassle of another strike, and hopes that somehow the Union can improve things for us without the need for further walkouts.
k979aaa
Posts: 12570
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by k979aaa »

peejay14 wrote:I didn't realise that posties were such a militant bunch. In my office it looked like we were just getting on with it, and it still does, yet to a man/woman we walked out (yes, including me, I thought I had no choice until I received RM's 'Back to Work' plan). I don't think many of us hope for much out of the coming talks, or new what to expect out of the strike, there was just an overall feeling of discontent that seemed to excuse the Union's orders. I believe that our office now feels that it could do without the hassle of another strike, and hopes that somehow the Union can improve things for us without the need for further walkouts.
Why blame the union for all the bad in your workplace for all what you have said is no doing of the union but of the management it shows the lack of union involvement in the workplace is why workers feel under valued and neglected and disenfranchised!.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by dvbuk55 »

DirtyHarry wrote:
peejay14 wrote:I aint in charge, Communication, Without Upsetting them.
Yeah, as I was saying, I'm looking forward to being back on the picket line, preferably before Santa starts out on his deliveries. :Very Happy
Well to cut a long story short :Very Happy :Very Happy :Very Happy I don't know how I managed to miss this - just lucky I guess :chuckle
peejay14
Posts: 90
Joined: 18 Oct 2009, 11:57
Gender: Male

Re: RM FIRST REVIEW TOMORROW

Post by peejay14 »

k979aaa wrote:all what you have said is no doing of the union but of the management
Sounds like you have been brain-washed, or have other k9s left you with just a thumb ?

Apparently the CWU agrees with the company that modernisation is necessary. Can anyone summarise what changes the union and the company both agree are necessary ? What common ground do they have ?

C'mon ACAS !!