Criticism about elements of their effectiveness is different to just attacking the whole organisation at any opportunity.tramssirhc wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 06:45It's classic trait of CWU loyalists to conflate critism with treachery. Only those not on the bag could consider the CWU a useful entity at the moment.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 06:23Exactly.pinstripe wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 00:11Yeah, let’s all pull our subs and chuck the union. We don’t need a union. RM are are great employer, the CWU are holding us back. Without them we could be living a life of luxury with, dare I dream, commit to deliver, unpaid breaks, no representation, imposed pay rises, I could go on, but alas, the CWU are the ones preventing this utopia from happeningtramssirhc wrote: ↑01 Apr 2025, 20:14In fairness the CWU deserve it. It's an awful organisation.chickenwittle wrote: ↑01 Apr 2025, 19:31The usual suspects straight on to put the boot into the CWU , boring.
Never understood the constant bashing of an organisation thats sole existence is to make our working life better.
You can have opinions on their direction of travel of whether they are dealing with certain issues well enough but the way some on here speak about them you would think they were the enemy within.
Bizarre. If you hate them that much leave the union and be done with it.
Calling them an awful organisation suggest they are bad to the core.
If you are still in the union them why?
Why would you pay for something that you despise so much.