I've mentioned previously that idea would work for people who are struggling with a full duty, start later, shorter delivery then take care of the lat's thus alleviating any overtime for them, I'd certainly go for it, there'd obviously be a bit of flexibility involved as the lat's can vary quite a lot day to day but I think that would be a good starting point for alternative duty structures.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 10:56They would rather we started later in the day I'm sure and have a hybrid sort of duties which could incorporate delivery, collections and LATS.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Uso agreement
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 4033
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
-
Mickeybrowneyes
- Posts: 411
- Joined: 12 Sep 2021, 06:18
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
Yeah, all these extra products allow reps to be more creative with duty structures and offer up more work life balance for members while keeping offices productive and efficient.ted_e_bear wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 12:23I've mentioned previously that idea would work for people who are struggling with a full duty, start later, shorter delivery then take care of the lat's thus alleviating any overtime for them, I'd certainly go for it, there'd obviously be a bit of flexibility involved as the lat's can vary quite a lot day to day but I think that would be a good starting point for alternative duty structures.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 10:56They would rather we started later in the day I'm sure and have a hybrid sort of duties which could incorporate delivery, collections and LATS.
Not for everyone though working into the evening.
I'd like a three day week personally, 12 hour 15 days.
Four days off a week.
Lovely.
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: Uso agreement
The reps don’t run the business, thankfully, and so it isn’t within their purview to offer up more work/life balance for members. That said, I hope the business will offer up more work/life balance for employees who want a less traditional work schedule.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 15:16Yeah, all these extra products allow reps to be more creative with duty structures and offer up more work life balance for members while keeping offices productive and efficient.
Not for everyone though working into the evening.
I'd like a three day week personally, 12 hour 15 days.
Four days off a week.
Lovely.
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3200
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
I dont think you quite understand the extent of Royal Mail and CWU's working relationshipSmoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 16:49The reps don’t run the business, thankfully, and so it isn’t within their purview to offer up more work/life balance for members. That said, I hope the business will offer up more work/life balance for employees who want a less traditional work schedule.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 15:16Yeah, all these extra products allow reps to be more creative with duty structures and offer up more work life balance for members while keeping offices productive and efficient.
Not for everyone though working into the evening.
I'd like a three day week personally, 12 hour 15 days.
Four days off a week.
Lovely.
For the moment at least, Royal Mail pay CWU reps and officials through full time release to do CWU work - duty patterns etc falls under that scope
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: Uso agreement
I understand very well how it works, thanks.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 16:56I dont think you quite understand the extent of Royal Mail and CWU's working relationshipSmoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 16:49The reps don’t run the business, thankfully, and so it isn’t within their purview to offer up more work/life balance for members. That said, I hope the business will offer up more work/life balance for employees who want a less traditional work schedule.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 15:16Yeah, all these extra products allow reps to be more creative with duty structures and offer up more work life balance for members while keeping offices productive and efficient.
Not for everyone though working into the evening.
I'd like a three day week personally, 12 hour 15 days.
Four days off a week.
Lovely.
For the moment at least, Royal Mail pay CWU reps and officials through full time release to do CWU work - duty patterns etc falls under that scope
Yes, said reps undoubtedly attempt to meddle so as to justify their very existence, but thankfully, as I have said, they don’t run the business. They have zilch input into such things. And as you yourself seem to accept by dint of your choice of words, it would be inappropriate and a conflict of interest for them to have a hand in duty planning and patterns — they would just look after their “mates” (members) and screw over employees (non-members specifically).
-
Mickeybrowneyes
- Posts: 411
- Joined: 12 Sep 2021, 06:18
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
Every office will get a vote on the duty patterns they want and the business may entertain more tweaks and adjustments from the reps if it's proves productive and efficient.
Better work life balance opportunities is one positive USO reform can bring.
Better work life balance opportunities is one positive USO reform can bring.
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3200
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
I dont think you do.Smoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 17:24I understand very well how it works, thanks.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 16:56I dont think you quite understand the extent of Royal Mail and CWU's working relationshipSmoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 16:49The reps don’t run the business, thankfully, and so it isn’t within their purview to offer up more work/life balance for members. That said, I hope the business will offer up more work/life balance for employees who want a less traditional work schedule.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 15:16Yeah, all these extra products allow reps to be more creative with duty structures and offer up more work life balance for members while keeping offices productive and efficient.
Not for everyone though working into the evening.
I'd like a three day week personally, 12 hour 15 days.
Four days off a week.
Lovely.
For the moment at least, Royal Mail pay CWU reps and officials through full time release to do CWU work - duty patterns etc falls under that scope
Yes, said reps undoubtedly attempt to meddle so as to justify their very existence, but thankfully, as I have said, they don’t run the business. They have zilch input into such things. And as you yourself seem to accept by dint of your choice of words, it would be inappropriate and a conflict of interest for them to have a hand in duty planning and patterns — they would just look after their “mates” (members) and screw over employees (non-members specifically).
They HAVE input in such things because Royal Mail allows them input due to past agreements
But you go ahead as a self proclaimed non CWU member and relative newcomer to Royal Mail to tell us all how things work
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: Uso agreement
They have air space in pointless “resourcing meetings”, yeah, assuming local managers can be bothered to convene same, but that in no way equates to input, let alone influence.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:33I dont think you do.
They HAVE input in such things because Royal Mail allows them input due to past agreements
-
Mr Rush
- Posts: 3226
- Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
Packet volumes make me think of a blocked toilet - rather than fix the problem they just keep flushing and flushing. Maybe the weight of the water will unblock it, but if misjudged it will overflow and make a horrendous mess. I am not being paid enough to clean it up.postslippete wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 10:29so the more they chase volumes without fixing the delivery model, the more risk they are taking on.
The machine stops.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12106
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
Overall are they going by what enters DOs or what is sorted by MCs? If it's the latter, then they'll be getting false numbers due to the number of direct yorks which won't be touched in processing. The direct yorks get wheeled off the artic and straight over to the relevant loading bay.Mr Rush wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:57Packet volumes make me think of a blocked toilet - rather than fix the problem they just keep flushing and flushing. Maybe the weight of the water will unblock it, but if misjudged it will overflow and make a horrendous mess. I am not being paid enough to clean it up.postslippete wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 10:29so the more they chase volumes without fixing the delivery model, the more risk they are taking on.
-
Mickeybrowneyes
- Posts: 411
- Joined: 12 Sep 2021, 06:18
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
Unit reps get withdrawn before revisions on some days to work and negotiate duty content and office structure with management and planners.Smoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:42They have air space in pointless “resourcing meetings”, yeah, assuming local managers can be bothered to convene same, but that in no way equates to input, let alone influence.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:33I dont think you do.
They HAVE input in such things because Royal Mail allows them input due to past agreements
Area reps help the process or undertake it if their isn't a local rep.
They can have huge influence and input, so your a bit off the mark there.
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 10:56
Not really a completely different topic, I can't answer whether their is cooking of the books because I don't know.
We were talking about why the company may be struggling to turn over a profit and trying to compete with other firms on an uneven playing field is one of the main reasons.
They have to offer that out of hours service otherwise they will lose the contracts completely, and it is where the growth is.
Comparing figures like you have and equipment between royal mail and Amazon indicates where the firms are financially.
They would rather we started later in the day I'm sure and have a hybrid sort of duties which could incorporate delivery, collections and LATS.
Obviously not a popular one across the membership, unless you had maybe a four day week or even a three day week on longer days maybe.
EP group and union have talked about working with with the government in some way to hopefully create a more equal playing field across the delivery industry.
With some set of regulations.
I don't know if that will happen but it has been mentioned.
Come on, you can't just sidestep the original creative accounting discussion by saying "I don't know" when the evidence is right in front of you! It has been proven and even accepted by analysts and the financial media that the company has used legal but misleading accounting tactics to preset a more dramatic picture than the reality. The biggest example is that they have previously claimed over a £1 billion in reported losses but it is in fact only an adjusted loss of £71 million because they used impairment charges that were not related to the day-to-day operations to inflate those losses.
https://www.ajbell.co.uk/articles/lates ... s-narrows
https://www.standard.co.uk/business/roy ... 81951.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britai ... 23-05-18/
This is not about conspiracy theories but understanding how corporate finance is used to shape perception and deflect accountability. Before we enter into anymore speculation as to why the company might be struggling to turn over a profit, this stuff has to be readily acknowledged otherwise we are just taking RM's version of reality at face value, and we have seen where that has got us before.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: Uso agreement
They undoubtedly enjoy FT release for revision processes but only because it has long been the status quo that they do. Air space and lip service is all that is provided. The days of the CWU and its reps having huge influence and input are, thankfully for us new starters at least, in the long-distant past.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑28 Jul 2025, 03:19Unit reps get withdrawn before revisions on some days to work and negotiate duty content and office structure with management and planners.Smoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:42They have air space in pointless “resourcing meetings”, yeah, assuming local managers can be bothered to convene same, but that in no way equates to input, let alone influence.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:33I dont think you do.
They HAVE input in such things because Royal Mail allows them input due to past agreements
Area reps help the process or undertake it if their isn't a local rep.
They can have huge influence and input, so your a bit off the mark there.
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3200
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Uso agreement
You keep telling yourself thatSmoothbackground wrote: ↑28 Jul 2025, 09:35They undoubtedly enjoy FT release for revision processes but only because it has long been the status quo that they do. Air space and lip service is all that is provided. The days of the CWU and its reps having huge influence and input are, thankfully for us new starters at least, in the long-distant past.Mickeybrowneyes wrote: ↑28 Jul 2025, 03:19Unit reps get withdrawn before revisions on some days to work and negotiate duty content and office structure with management and planners.Smoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:42They have air space in pointless “resourcing meetings”, yeah, assuming local managers can be bothered to convene same, but that in no way equates to input, let alone influence.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 18:33I dont think you do.
They HAVE input in such things because Royal Mail allows them input due to past agreements
Area reps help the process or undertake it if their isn't a local rep.
They can have huge influence and input, so your a bit off the mark there.
Note how youve now changed it to they dont have HUGE influence having been told how they have influence
Maybe just accept you dont know everything
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: Uso agreement
“Huge influence” was Mickey’s phrase which I was merely regurgitating. I will therefore rephrase it so that it is totally unambiguous.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑28 Jul 2025, 09:56Note how youve now changed it to they dont have HUGE influence having been told how they have influence
Maybe just accept you dont know everything
They undoubtedly enjoy FT release for revision processes but only because it has long been the status quo that they do. Air space and lip service is all that is provided. The days of the CWU and its reps having any influence and input are, thankfully for us new starters at least, in the long-distant past.