Sorry I’m confused - it says nearly 4000 roles have been uplifted from PT - FT - but only 449 of these are permanent staff ?
So are the temporary staff agency or temp contracts who may not be retained
And why so few perm staff uplifted
Does this explain why so many in our DO haven’t been offered or accepted ?
It’s a genuine question
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
-
Agencyoap
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 25 Jul 2023, 18:12
- Gender: Male
Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1934
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
The CWU was and is fully aware that increases would be temporary. In fact during the data verification it came to light that thousands of CWU members who thought they were on permanent contracts were in fact on temporary variations. These variations were years old.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Agencyoap
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 25 Jul 2023, 18:12
- Gender: Male
Re: Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
3500 of them ?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 17:11The CWU was and is fully aware that increases would be temporary. In fact during the data verification it came to light that thousands of CWU members who thought they were on permanent contracts were in fact on temporary variations. These variations were years old.
After 4 years do these not become perm by law ?
Are you saying all the temp uplifts were on old temp contracts
If so then are they not now perm
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3491
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
In reply to the OP it's the actual hours being increased to FT which is temporary, not temporary staff being updated to FT hours. Why it's only a temporary move can only be explained by the CWU, as unless DM26 is ever withdrawn, or something else replaces it, then it looks likely the moves to FT hours will last indefinitely.
I seem to have my hours increased to FT on the Peoples App/Payslip but had no other indication my hours have been increased.
I seem to have my hours increased to FT on the Peoples App/Payslip but had no other indication my hours have been increased.
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1934
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
The legality of the increase and it's permanence depends on what the contract says. If the contract or any amendment to it contains a clause saying it is temporary then it's temporary.Agencyoap wrote: ↑Today, 17:373500 of them ?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 17:11The CWU was and is fully aware that increases would be temporary. In fact during the data verification it came to light that thousands of CWU members who thought they were on permanent contracts were in fact on temporary variations. These variations were years old.
After 4 years do these not become perm by law ?
Are you saying all the temp uplifts were on old temp contracts
If so then are they not now perm
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
zacattack
- Posts: 48
- Joined: 12 Dec 2024, 07:23
- Gender: Female
Re: Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
Sounds like those walks that are getting added by taking bits off other walks to form them and then lapsing them.
-
Agencyoap
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 25 Jul 2023, 18:12
- Gender: Male
Re: Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
Ok - when I was in business, temp/fixed term of say 6 months, if continued without renewing each period, would be considered permanent after 4 years unless prior agreed collective agreement by say unions - in which case the unions would have known about it !tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 19:37The legality of the increase and it's permanence depends on what the contract says. If the contract or any amendment to it contains a clause saying it is temporary then it's temporary.Agencyoap wrote: ↑Today, 17:373500 of them ?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 17:11The CWU was and is fully aware that increases would be temporary. In fact during the data verification it came to light that thousands of CWU members who thought they were on permanent contracts were in fact on temporary variations. These variations were years old.
After 4 years do these not become perm by law ?
Are you saying all the temp uplifts were on old temp contracts
If so then are they not now perm
But maybe this has changed since then
Still seems odd that some 80% of uplifts are temp ?
Any Hoe
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3491
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
I've not received a contract I just noticed my hours have increased to 37 hours on my payslip, I wasn't even told I didn't need to continue logging my daily OT showing the difference between PT & FT once DM26 started.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 19:37The legality of the increase and it's permanence depends on what the contract says. If the contract or any amendment to it contains a clause saying it is temporary then it's temporary.Agencyoap wrote: ↑Today, 17:373500 of them ?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 17:11The CWU was and is fully aware that increases would be temporary. In fact during the data verification it came to light that thousands of CWU members who thought they were on permanent contracts were in fact on temporary variations. These variations were years old.
After 4 years do these not become perm by law ?
Are you saying all the temp uplifts were on old temp contracts
If so then are they not now perm
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4190
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Why so few perm staff uplifted ?
Simple question - have employees been told in writing that their hours are permanent or has a manager offered an employee a temporary increase in their hours/contract verbally?
Permanent increases in hours and temporary contractual variations are not the same thing.
Permanent increases in hours and temporary contractual variations are not the same thing.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.