ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Standard of new starters
-
Walter sobchak
- Posts: 469
- Joined: 13 Feb 2014, 04:46
- Gender: Male
Standard of new starters
Is shockingly bad.
They range from gormless at best and bone idle at worst.
Guy I was training today wore huge DJ style headphones out of delivery and wasn’t the least bit interested in learning the job.
They range from gormless at best and bone idle at worst.
Guy I was training today wore huge DJ style headphones out of delivery and wasn’t the least bit interested in learning the job.
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
Thats part of the problem when pay drops closer to minimum wage for what is still a physically demanding job. RM are not attracting people who see it as a long term career anymore but people who see it as just another temporary job. When pay and conditions become less competitive the overall quality and retention inevitably suffers.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
-
Mr Rush
- Posts: 2848
- Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
And he'll probably get six months out of the job because they're desperate to keep people regardless. It seems incredibly difficult for new starts to get fired. The last few that I'm aware of have been for extremely frequent absences from the outset, yet have been on the receiving end of far more grace than long-serving staff ever got at the start of their employment with RM.
Any Questions?
Yeah, how do I get out of this chickenshit outfit?
Yeah, how do I get out of this chickenshit outfit?
-
scratted
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 10:33
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
Minimum wage = minimum effort
-
A2B
- Posts: 1759
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:34
- Gender: Male
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
If you are training someone why would you accept this type of behaviour. The old hands who trained me wouldn't have and I would have been told it wasn't acceptable. If you want the best from people lead by example.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑09 Apr 2026, 21:36Is shockingly bad.
They range from gormless at best and bone idle at worst.
Guy I was training today wore huge DJ style headphones out of delivery and wasn’t the least bit interested in learning the job.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Walter sobchak
- Posts: 469
- Joined: 13 Feb 2014, 04:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
I think You have me confused with someone who cares.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 06:31If you are training someone why would you accept this type of behaviour. The old hands who trained me wouldn't have and I would have been told it wasn't acceptable. If you want the best from people lead by example.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑09 Apr 2026, 21:36Is shockingly bad.
They range from gormless at best and bone idle at worst.
Guy I was training today wore huge DJ style headphones out of delivery and wasn’t the least bit interested in learning the job.
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3164
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
Pay peanuts get monkeys
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
WalkerX
- Posts: 376
- Joined: 20 Feb 2021, 22:31
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
TBF our recent recruits, who are in their early twenties, are really good. Two have been on seemingly permanent sick leave, but are the ones who didn`t want to be here in the first place. I`m amazed they`re still here. The good ones have the right attitude and have been looked after by the senior posties. It`s in our interests that they stay. When I say "our" I mean fellow posties. Couldn`t care less about what management want.
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
You cared enough to make a public statement contrary to your contract of employment.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑Yesterday, 16:45I think You have me confused with someone who cares.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 06:31If you are training someone why would you accept this type of behaviour. The old hands who trained me wouldn't have and I would have been told it wasn't acceptable. If you want the best from people lead by example.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑09 Apr 2026, 21:36Is shockingly bad.
They range from gormless at best and bone idle at worst.
Guy I was training today wore huge DJ style headphones out of delivery and wasn’t the least bit interested in learning the job.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Kenfandango
- Posts: 686
- Joined: 19 Oct 2021, 16:40
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
The two new starters that have gone on "long term sick" at our place have in fact been put in some royal mail limbo space after filing grievances against managers- both separately and both for the discrepancy in treatment they were recieving.
The guy who has been off since January was sick of the legacy non-driver he was chauffeuring about being allowed to clock out early and go home, while new guy got told to go back out or work indoors. The one who went off in November was sick of clearing 2-4 days mail every day on various duties while another new start (who, coincidentally, is our COMs next door neighbour's kid) got put on a cushy single van duty on week 4 of employment, where he remains....
For some reason Royal Mail have both these people down as "sick" despite us all knowing what's going on
The guy who has been off since January was sick of the legacy non-driver he was chauffeuring about being allowed to clock out early and go home, while new guy got told to go back out or work indoors. The one who went off in November was sick of clearing 2-4 days mail every day on various duties while another new start (who, coincidentally, is our COMs next door neighbour's kid) got put on a cushy single van duty on week 4 of employment, where he remains....
For some reason Royal Mail have both these people down as "sick" despite us all knowing what's going on
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2157
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
So why start a thread about new starters if you don't CARE.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑Yesterday, 16:45I think You have me confused with someone who cares.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 06:31If you are training someone why would you accept this type of behaviour. The old hands who trained me wouldn't have and I would have been told it wasn't acceptable. If you want the best from people lead by example.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑09 Apr 2026, 21:36Is shockingly bad.
They range from gormless at best and bone idle at worst.
Guy I was training today wore huge DJ style headphones out of delivery and wasn’t the least bit interested in learning the job.
-
Walter sobchak
- Posts: 469
- Joined: 13 Feb 2014, 04:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
Just putting it out there what Royal Mail attracts these days for new recruits.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 19:18You cared enough to make a public statement contrary to your contract of employment.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑Yesterday, 16:45I think You have me confused with someone who cares.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 06:31If you are training someone why would you accept this type of behaviour. The old hands who trained me wouldn't have and I would have been told it wasn't acceptable. If you want the best from people lead by example.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑09 Apr 2026, 21:36Is shockingly bad.
They range from gormless at best and bone idle at worst.
Guy I was training today wore huge DJ style headphones out of delivery and wasn’t the least bit interested in learning the job.
Whether a new recruit stays or leaves is out of my hands hence why I couldn’t care less.
-
Walter sobchak
- Posts: 469
- Joined: 13 Feb 2014, 04:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
See above.Sean06 wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:15So why start a thread about new starters if you don't CARE.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑Yesterday, 16:45I think You have me confused with someone who cares.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 06:31If you are training someone why would you accept this type of behaviour. The old hands who trained me wouldn't have and I would have been told it wasn't acceptable. If you want the best from people lead by example.Walter sobchak wrote: ↑09 Apr 2026, 21:36Is shockingly bad.
They range from gormless at best and bone idle at worst.
Guy I was training today wore huge DJ style headphones out of delivery and wasn’t the least bit interested in learning the job.![]()
-
Mr Rush
- Posts: 2848
- Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Standard of new starters
Is this the mystery illness that the company always claims is decimating offices up and down the land?Kenfandango wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:02For some reason Royal Mail have both these people down as "sick" despite us all knowing what's going on
Any Questions?
Yeah, how do I get out of this chickenshit outfit?
Yeah, how do I get out of this chickenshit outfit?