ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Cycle to work??
-
macthejaffa
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 20:18
- Gender: Male
Cycle to work??
Anyone got any idea of the cycle to work benefit is coming back? It just says the window is closed but it has been for ages now so is it on ice or never likely to return……
-
BenacreNick
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: 18 Jul 2022, 13:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Cycle to work??
I believe RM can't gamble with staff potentially falling below minimum wage once the deductions have been calculated from wages Mac.
Could this change in April, possibly not if the minimum wage rises again ?
Could this change in April, possibly not if the minimum wage rises again ?
-
Duesouth
- Posts: 257
- Joined: 14 Sep 2018, 17:25
- Gender: Male
Re: Cycle to work??
The company can gamble to make sure all workers lose out on many benefits like POAL and the cycle scheme. They don't care if you have to walk to work.BenacreNick wrote: ↑Today, 17:29I believe RM can't gamble with staff potentially falling below minimum wage once the deductions have been calculated from wages Mac.
Could this change in April, possibly not if the minimum wage rises again ?
The business are aware of the ramifications of falling below the minimum wage threshold and most of us have to suffer because of miscalculation. What a great company
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Cycle to work??
Yes they used that excuse before the last payrise - but legacy are nowhere near minimum wage so it doesnt wash anymoreBenacreNick wrote: ↑Today, 17:29I believe RM can't gamble with staff potentially falling below minimum wage once the deductions have been calculated from wages Mac.
Could this change in April, possibly not if the minimum wage rises again ?
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
A2B
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:34
- Gender: Male
Re: Cycle to work??
Haven't RM calculated it with a ridiculous 20% buffer which is why legacy staff along with new starts cannot qualify for Benefits.Acca Dacca wrote: ↑Today, 18:00Yes they used that excuse before the last payrise - but legacy are nowhere near minimum wage so it doesnt wash anymoreBenacreNick wrote: ↑Today, 17:29I believe RM can't gamble with staff potentially falling below minimum wage once the deductions have been calculated from wages Mac.
Could this change in April, possibly not if the minimum wage rises again ?
I imagine RM are trying to use this in the ODM talks and if/when any agreement is reached it will be reviewed
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Cycle to work??
Out of interest why is it a gamble, they know our rate of pay and the MW, so all they have to do is tell each employee you can spend £x once they've calculated the difference between the two figures?BenacreNick wrote: ↑Today, 17:29I believe RM can't gamble with staff potentially falling below minimum wage once the deductions have been calculated from wages Mac.
Could this change in April, possibly not if the minimum wage rises again ?
-
rogersh
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: 26 Oct 2011, 11:31
- Gender: Male
Re: Cycle to work??
As pointed out, the calculation uses a buffer or "margin" as this reply (edited) from HR explains regarding POAL;
" The check can only look at basic pay and must ensure that no colleague’s hourly rate could fall below the legal minimum at any point during the year. That means we have to consider what could change during the year and apply a margin to cover those changes. This margin has to cover all possibilities and when applied to the check significantly increase the likelihood of someone not passing the check."
" The check can only look at basic pay and must ensure that no colleague’s hourly rate could fall below the legal minimum at any point during the year. That means we have to consider what could change during the year and apply a margin to cover those changes. This margin has to cover all possibilities and when applied to the check significantly increase the likelihood of someone not passing the check."