ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!


Vic Keegan’s Lost London 182: What became of the General Post Office?

Reminisce about days gone by in the job.How it used to be what you miss and how things have changed.This is an open forum.
Post Reply
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 69390
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: Proud to be part of the Union

Vic Keegan’s Lost London 182: What became of the General Post Office?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

https://www.onlondon.co.uk/vic-keegans- ... st-office/

Image


Robert Smirke's magnificent building lasted less than 100 years
Victor Keegan

At first glance this building could be mistaken for the British Museum. That would not be surprising. It was designed by the same architect – Sir Robert Smirke, the Greek revivalist – and built at around the same time as the BM in the 1820s. A contemporary description said it was “a post office concealed behind a front fit for a palace”. The only difference is that the British Museum is still standing proud in Bloomsbury while the General Post Office near St Paul’s has completely disappeared. It was pulled down in 1912 in what would today be described as an act of cultural vandalism.

Britain’s postal service can be traced back to a 1635 decision of Charles I (1625-1649) to allow the Royal Mail to be used for private correspondence. Eight years later, the first general post office opened on Cloak Lane off Dowgate Hill in the City. That building and others lasted a long time, and when rapid expansion became inevitable at the start of the 19th century the GPO started buying up slum property on the east side of St. Martin’s Le Grand. This cleared the way for the construction of Smirke’s 120 metre long tour de force, which was built between 1825 and 1829 and illuminated at night by a thousand gas burners.

Postal history in the 19th century is mainly remembered for a stroke of genius by Rowland Hill and a major innovation by the novelist Anthony Trollope, both of whom were employees of the Post Office. Hill successfully argued for a uniform rate for postage linked to weight rather than, as was the case then, being based on distance travelled and the number of pages within the envelope. Postage – bizarrely – was paid by the recipient rather than the sender. This gave rise to all sorts of fiddles as people sometimes put short coded messages on the envelope so the recipient could both read the message and refuse to accept delivery.

Hill’s proposals were supported by another genius, Charles Babbage, the “father of the computer”, who argued that the critical cost of the postal system was not transport but the complex handling procedures at both ends, which pre-paid stamps could hugely reduce. But his plan did not receive universal approval. The Postmaster, Lord Lichfield, denounced his “wild and visionary schemes.” while William Leader Maberly, Secretary to the Post Office, said: “This plan appears to be a preposterous one, utterly unsupported by facts and resting entirely on assumption.” But successful it was, and soon led to the introduction of the world’s first adhesive stamp, the Penny Black.

In the mid-1860s, Trollope, who had reached a moderately senior position within the Post Office despite differences with Hill, was credited with introducing the soon-to-be ubiquitous pillar-box.

Both of these innovations have been threatened by something neither Hill, Trollope or anyone else could have foreseen – that primary communications would need no stamps at all. The invention of emails has changed all that. It is quite possible in future that our only memory of the historic postal service will be the iconic post boxes – unless they too are lost in a fresh outburst of cultural vandalism.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support
Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
"Employers are always seeking more productivity from workers, without considering the human factor, the worker's age, the weather conditions and the intense heat. We need to intervene before it's too late, reducing working hours and the load carried by workers, because it's impossible to sustain the rhythm they're forced to work at for many years."

Post Reply