https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/uk- ... ng-6258584
Paul Duffy said he had been unfairly dismissed, but he was fired for failing to look where he was going
A veteran postman has lost an unfair dismissal claim against Royal Mail after he was sacked for injuring himself twice at work by not watching where he was walking.
Paul Duffy first tripped on a path and fractured his shoulder. Then, about three months later, he slipped on a sledge in a driveway and broke his knee while reading his mail.
The postman claimed the sledge was hidden under a blanket of snow and this is why he did not see it, but the homeowner whose house he was delivering to at the time claimed it was perfectly visible.
They also told Mr Duffy's bosses they saw him reading his mail and not watching where he was walking before he fell.
His bosses ruled he was 'distracted because he was reading whilst walking' in both incidents and sacked him for dishonesty and 'disregard to health and safety' in March 2021, following nearly 20 years of service with Royal Mail.
Mr Duffy filed a claim of unfair dismissal at an employment tribunal held in Newcastle but Employment Judge John Morris ruled the decision to sack him was fair and dismissed his claim.
The tribunal heard Mr Duffy was handed a two-year suspended dismissal - a form of final written warning - in 2019 after he submitted fraudulent overtime claims.
This meant any future misconduct could lead to his dismissal.
In October 2020 Mr Duffy was working from the delivery office in Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham, when he entered the driveway of a property to which he was delivering mail and tripped on the edge of the pathway and fell, fracturing his shoulder.
The tribunal heard he was placed on sick leave and would carry out light work from the office but no action was taken against him following this incident.
However, in January 2021, Mr Duffy suffered another fall while he was delivering mail.
He told his bosses he had delivered mail to a property and, as he turned to leave, he stood on a sledge, which caused him to fall.
The injury report noted: "The conditions were icy as it had been snowing, the drive had small patches of compact snow on it although the paving below was clearly visible. For whatever reason Mr Duffy has failed to see that sledge prior to walking down the drive."
Mr Duffy had x-rays at a local hospital and found out he had a broken knee and torn ligaments which required surgery. He was initially signed off work for four weeks but this was extended until the end of February due to a 'stress-related problem'.
The tribunal heard the homeowners told Royal Mail: "Mr Duffy handed over a parcel and turned to leave the property... As he turned to leave... Mr Duffy was looking at the bundle of mail as if to see where he was going next. As he left the doorstep he took two steps and stood on a sledge which had been left on the drive... Mr Duffy stood on the sledge and slipped falling heavily..."
The homeowners said the sledge wasn’t covered in snow as 'it hadn’t been out all night and had in fact just been put out from inside the house an hour earlier than when the incident occurred'.
The 'root cause' of the incident was recorded as 'Likelihood is Mr Duffy was reading mail whilst walking and not paying attention'.
A fact-finding meeting was held in late January 2021, during which Mr Duffy explained: "I turned to leave and stood down from the step, took a couple of steps between the parked cars and I stood on a patch of snow."
The tribunal heard he explained it was only after he fell that he realised that he had 'stood on a patch of snow and the sledge was underneath the snow... There was snow all over'.
The case was passed on to Tom Carver, delivery office manager, for a formal conduct meeting in February 2021 'to discuss discrepancies within the accident investigation'.
The conduct to be discussed was said to be potential dishonesty and potential 'deliberate disregard to health and safety'.
Mr Duffy said at this meeting: "I was looking straight ahead at where I was going.
"I stated that I stood on a patch of snow. I don’t know if the sledge was fully covered in snow.
"I don’t know if the sledge was fully covered or not."
Mr Carver concluded Mr Duffy 'knew there were patches of snow on the drive and should have recognised the danger' and added there wouldn't have been enough snowfall for the sledge to be covered in any event.
He said: "I believe Mr Duffy decided to claim that the sledge was under snow in a way to hide that again he was to blame for his own accident...
"It was clear that in both incidents [Mr Duffy] was distracted because he was reading whilst walking. He had failed to identify the sledge, which was a deliberate disregard to health and safety."
The claim of unfair dismissal was unsuccessful.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Postman sacked after twice falling over on his round loses claim
- POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 31395
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Postman sacked after twice falling over on his round loses claim
I Wrote
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
- Posts: 511
- Joined: 21 Oct 2021, 11:09
- Gender: Female
Re: Postman sacked after twice falling over on his round loses claim
Employee with a bad sick record who'd already had extended sick leave through an earlier accident on duty, has another genuine bad accident and needed surgery, managers are seething that it has happened again so find a way to make him culpable for the latest accident. If they didn't believe his version of events, unpaid leave was a reasonable option. The guy had surgery, and the accident was genuine. As for the previous serious warning, if it hadn't been a minor breach of the rules he would have been dismissed for fraud without question. These cases are a prime example how the business is now 'streamlining' the staff numbers
-
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 69489
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: Proud to be part of the Union
Re: Postman sacked after twice falling over on his round loses claim
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... dgment.pdf
Is the tribunal record which explains the decision of the judge and the background to the dismissal.
Is the tribunal record which explains the decision of the judge and the background to the dismissal.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support
Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
"Employers are always seeking more productivity from workers, without considering the human factor, the worker's age, the weather conditions and the intense heat. We need to intervene before it's too late, reducing working hours and the load carried by workers, because it's impossible to sustain the rhythm they're forced to work at for many years."
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support
Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
"Employers are always seeking more productivity from workers, without considering the human factor, the worker's age, the weather conditions and the intense heat. We need to intervene before it's too late, reducing working hours and the load carried by workers, because it's impossible to sustain the rhythm they're forced to work at for many years."
-
- Posts: 511
- Joined: 21 Oct 2021, 11:09
- Gender: Female
Re: Postman sacked after twice falling over on his round loses claim
Those 2 year serious warnings are deadly. This guy got his for 'fraudulent overtime claims and dishonesty'. Sounds bad on the face of it. But the facts are; The total was one hour of overtime. The DOM fully accepted his explanations so it wasn't officially recorded as fraud, just suspected fraud. People get confused, enter it on the wrong day, enter the wrong amount, it happens. He hadn't done anything like it before in 20 years, so it was accepted as a mistake and resolved. Rightly or wrongly, the DOM then issued the 2 year serious warning, and it was signed by the lad involved, he was just relieved because they had threatened him with the sack for months. My advice is, never sign anything. You don't have to. The CWU should have objected to the punishment. By signing the warning, he agreed to it and legally this counted against him after he had his 2 accidents. They found a reason to call him dishonest in explaining his account of the 2nd serious accident, which together with his first dishonesty charge was enough to cost him his job.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: arees3061@gmail.com, wendelspanswick and 4 guests